Department of Spine Surgery, Qingdao Municipal Hospital Group, No.5 Donghai Middle Road, Shinan District, Qingdao, 266000, China.
Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, No.49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Apr 13;25(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07364-7.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychological distress pre-operatively, at 3, 6, and 12 months in patients who underwent lumbar spine fusion surgery.
A total of 440 patients received instrumented lumbar spine fusion were enrolled. Psychological distress was evaluated using the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ) and the Modified Zung Depressive Index (ZDI). The results of lumbar fusion surgery were evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA-29), and the visual analog scale (VAS).
Psychological distress was reported among 23% of patients and 7, 5.5, and 4.0% of the patients preoperatively, at 3, 6, and 12 months after lumbar surgery, respectively. The mean MSPQ score decreased from 8.78 (before surgery) to 4.30, 3.52, and 3.43 at 3, 6 and 12 months in after surgery, respectively, in patients with psychological distress patients (p < 0.001). The mean ZDI score decreased from 17.78 to 12.48, 10.35, and 9.61 (p < 0.001). The mean ODI score decreased from 22.91 to 11.78, 10.13, and 9.96 (P < 0.001). The mean JOA score increased from 13.65 to 22.30, 23.43, and 23.61 (P < 0.001). The mean low back pain (LBP) VAS score decreased from 4.48 to 1.96, 1.52, and 1.51 (P < 0.001); moreover, the mean leg pain (LP) VAS score decreased from 5.30 to 1.30, 1.04, and 1.03 (P < 0.001).
Patients with psychological distress may experience surgical intervention benefits equal to those of ordinary patients. Moreover, reduced pain and disability after surgical intervention may also alleviate psychological distress. Hence, we highly recommend that patients with psychological distress undergo surgical intervention as normal patients do, but appropriate screening measures and interventions are necessary.
本研究旨在评估行腰椎融合术患者术前、术后 3、6 和 12 个月的心理困扰。
共纳入 440 例行器械性腰椎融合术的患者。使用改良躯体知觉问卷(MSPQ)和改良 Zung 抑郁指数(ZDI)评估心理困扰。采用 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)、日本矫形协会(JOA-29)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估腰椎融合术的结果。
23%的患者报告存在心理困扰,术前、术后 3、6 和 12 个月分别为 7%、5.5%、4.0%。有心理困扰的患者 MSPQ 评分从术前的 8.78 分降至术后 3、6 和 12 个月的 4.30、3.52 和 3.43 分(p<0.001)。ZDI 评分从 17.78 分降至 12.48、10.35 和 9.61 分(p<0.001)。ODI 评分从 22.91 分降至 11.78、10.13 和 9.96 分(P<0.001)。JOA 评分从 13.65 分增至 22.30、23.43 和 23.61 分(P<0.001)。下腰痛(LBP)VAS 评分从 4.48 分降至 1.96、1.52 和 1.51 分(P<0.001);腿痛(LP)VAS 评分从 5.30 分降至 1.30、1.04 和 1.03 分(P<0.001)。
有心理困扰的患者可能经历与普通患者相等的手术干预获益。此外,手术干预后疼痛和残疾的减轻也可能缓解心理困扰。因此,我们强烈建议有心理困扰的患者像普通患者一样接受手术干预,但需要采取适当的筛查措施和干预措施。