Suppr超能文献

作为差异后果函数的活动偏好分析。

Analysis of activity preferences as a function of differential consequences.

作者信息

Hanley G P, Iwata B A, Lindberg J S

机构信息

Psychology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Winter;32(4):419-35. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-419.

Abstract

Individuals who do not possess the verbal skills to express meaningful choice in the absence of its consequences may have difficulty indicating their preference for protracted activities that are unavailable until some time in the future (e.g., taking a walk, riding a bike). When we examined the preferences of 4 individuals with developmental disabilities by showing them pictorial representations of various activities, their initial choices showed no clear preferences. In a subsequent condition, selecting a photograph resulted in brief access to the depicted activity. When selections produced differential consequences (i.e., access to the activity), clear preferences emerged. In addition, 3 individuals' preferences were later shifted to an initially less preferred but more socially desirable option by superimposing additional reinforcement contingencies for engaging in the less preferred activity. Results are discussed in terms of the conditions under which choice functions as an indicator of preference and how those conditions may be altered to improve the quality of choice making without limiting access to preferred options.

摘要

那些在没有行为后果的情况下不具备表达有意义选择的语言能力的人,可能难以表明他们对直到未来某个时间才会有的长期活动的偏好(例如,散步、骑自行车)。当我们通过向4名发育障碍患者展示各种活动的图片来检查他们的偏好时,他们最初的选择没有显示出明显的偏好。在随后的一种情况下,选择一张照片会导致短暂接触到所描绘的活动。当选择产生不同的后果(即接触到活动)时,明显的偏好就出现了。此外,通过为参与不太喜欢的活动叠加额外的强化条件,3名患者的偏好后来转向了一个最初不太喜欢但更符合社会期望的选项。本文根据选择作为偏好指标的条件以及如何改变这些条件以提高决策质量而不限制获得偏好选项的机会来讨论结果。

相似文献

1
Analysis of activity preferences as a function of differential consequences.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Winter;32(4):419-35. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-419.
2
Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):475-84. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-475.
3
Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):411-22. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-411.
4
Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Spring;40(1):25-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.151-05.
5
An evaluation of the effects of matched stimuli on behaviors maintained by automatic reinforcement.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Spring;33(1):13-27. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-13.
6
The treatment of covert self-injury through contingencies on response products.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):239-42. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-239.
7
Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Spring;29(1):1-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-1.
8
Reinforcing efficacy of interactions with preferred and nonpreferred staff under progressive-ratio schedules.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Summer;41(2):221-5. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-221.
9
Response-restriction analysis: I. Assessment of activity preferences.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Spring;36(1):47-58. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-47.
10
On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):423-38. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-423.

引用本文的文献

2
Advance Notice for Transition-Related Problem Behavior: Practice Guidelines.
Behav Anal Pract. 2014 Aug 19;7(2):117-25. doi: 10.1007/s40617-014-0014-3. eCollection 2014 Oct.
4
Preliminary investigation of a video-based stimulus preference assessment.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Summer;45(2):413-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-413.
7
Progressing toward data intimacy: a review of within-session data analysis.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Fall;41(3):319-31. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-319.
8
Determining individual preschoolers' preferences in a group arrangement.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Spring;41(1):25-37. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-25.
9
Evaluating preschool children's preferences for motivational systems during instruction.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Summer;40(2):249-61. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.59-05.
10
The effects of providing access to stimuli following choice making during vocal preference assessments.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Winter;39(4):501-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.56-05.

本文引用的文献

1
The functional independence of mands and tacts.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jan;43(1):5-19. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-5.
2
The effects of pictorial versus tangible stimuli in stimulus-preference assessments.
Res Dev Disabil. 1999 Jan-Feb;20(1):63-72. doi: 10.1016/s0891-4222(98)00032-8.
3
Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):459-73. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-459.
4
Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):519-32; quiz 532-3. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.
5
A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: the utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):201-12. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-201.
6
Increasing self-determination: teaching people with mental retardation to evaluate residential options.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):173-88. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-173.
7
Validating predicted activity preferences of individuals with severe disabilities.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Summer;26(2):239-45. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-239.
8
Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Fall;27(3):505-18. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-505.
9
Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249-55. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验