基于视频的刺激偏好评估的初步研究。
Preliminary investigation of a video-based stimulus preference assessment.
机构信息
Utah State University, Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation, Logan 84322, USA.
出版信息
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Summer;45(2):413-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-413.
Abstract
Video clips may be an effective format for presenting complex stimuli in preference assessments. In this preliminary study, we evaluated the correspondence between preference hierarchies generated from preference assessments that included either toys or videos of the toys. The top-ranked item corresponded in both assessments for 5 of the 6 participants, and the top- and bottom-ranked items corresponded for 4 participants. The implications of these results for future research on video preference assessments are discussed.
摘要
视频剪辑可能是一种在偏好评估中呈现复杂刺激物的有效形式。在这项初步研究中，我们评估了包含玩具或玩具视频的偏好评估所产生的偏好层级之间的对应关系。在 6 名参与者中，有 5 名参与者的顶级项目在这两种评估中相对应，而有 4 名参与者的顶级和最低级项目相对应。这些结果对未来关于视频偏好评估的研究具有一定的启示意义。
相似文献
1
Preliminary investigation of a video-based stimulus preference assessment.基于视频的刺激偏好评估的初步研究。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Summer;45(2):413-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-413.
2
Web-based stimulus preference assessment and reinforcer assessment for videos.基于网络的刺激偏好评估和视频强化物评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2019 Jul;52(3):796-803. doi: 10.1002/jaba.593. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
3
Using video modeling for generalizing toy play in children with autism.使用视频示范来推广自闭症儿童的玩具玩耍能力。
Behav Modif. 2007 Sep;31(5):660-81. doi: 10.1177/0145445507301651.
4
Further refinement of video-based brief multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessments.基于视频的简短无替换多重刺激偏好评估的进一步优化。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Jan;50(1):170-175. doi: 10.1002/jaba.358. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
5
Using videos to assess preference for novel stimuli in children with autism.使用视频评估自闭症儿童对新异刺激的偏好。
Dev Neurorehabil. 2017 Nov;20(8):560-564. doi: 10.1080/17518423.2016.1237583. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
6
Training staff to conduct a paired-stimulus preference assessment.培训工作人员进行配对刺激偏好评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Summer;35(2):209-11. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-209.
7
Further examination of video-based preference assessments without contingent access.进一步检查没有附带访问的基于视频的偏好评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2019 Feb;52(1):258-270. doi: 10.1002/jaba.507. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
8
Evaluating the effects of social interaction on the results of preference assessments for leisure items.评估社交互动对休闲物品偏好评估结果的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2022 Mar;55(2):430-450. doi: 10.1002/jaba.897. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
9
The impact of high- and low-preference stimuli on vocational and academic performances of youths with severe disabilities.高偏好和低偏好刺激对重度残疾青少年职业和学业表现的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Spring;39(1):131-5. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.32-05.
10
No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm.自闭症成人在直视与回避目光上没有偏好：一个强化偏好注视范式。
Mol Autism. 2020 Nov 18;11(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13229-020-00398-3.
引用本文的文献
1
Assessing Preferences for Animals in Children with Autism: A New Use for Video-Based Preference Assessment.评估自闭症儿童对动物的偏好：基于视频的偏好评估的新用途。
Front Vet Sci. 2017 Mar 10;4:29. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00029. eCollection 2017.
2
An Evaluation of a Brief Video-Based Multiple-Stimulus Without Replacement Preference Assessment.基于视频的简短无替换多重刺激偏好评估的评价
Behav Anal Pract. 2015 Aug 13;9(2):160-4. doi: 10.1007/s40617-015-0081-0. eCollection 2016 Jun.
3
Using Computer Tablets to Assess Preference for Videos in Children with Autism.使用平板电脑评估自闭症儿童对视频的偏好。
Behav Anal Pract. 2016 Feb 1;9(1):50-3. doi: 10.1007/s40617-016-0109-0. eCollection 2016 Mar.
本文引用的文献
1
The effects of providing access to stimuli following choice making during vocal preference assessments.在发声偏好评估过程中，做出选择后提供刺激接触的效果。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Winter;39(4):501-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.56-05.
2
Assessing object-to-picture and picture-to-object matching as prerequisite skills for pictorial preference assessments.评估物体与图片及图片与物体的匹配，作为图片偏好评估的先决技能。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Winter;38(4):543-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.161-04.
3
Analysis of activity preferences as a function of differential consequences.作为差异后果函数的活动偏好分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Winter;32(4):419-35. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-419.
4
A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.两种为重度和极重度残疾人士识别强化物方法的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.
Zotero 插件