• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对重度智力迟钝个体的刺激偏好和强化物价值的评估。

Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

作者信息

Pace G M, Ivancic M T, Edwards G L, Iwata B A, Page T J

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249-55. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249
PMID:4044458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1308015/
Abstract

We evaluated a procedure for identifying potential reinforcers with profoundly retarded individuals. In Experiment 1, six persons were repeatedly exposed to 16 stimuli, and approach behaviors to each stimulus were used to identify preferred and nonpreferred stimuli. In Experiment 2, we examined the reinforcing properties of preferred and nonpreferred stimuli by delivering them contingently on the occurrence of arbitrarily selected responses. Results revealed that the preferred stimulus conditions typically produced higher rates of responding than did either the baseline or the nonpreferred stimulus conditions, suggesting that the procedure can be used to assess reinforcer value for individuals with limited behavioral repertoires.

摘要

我们评估了一种用于识别重度智力障碍个体潜在强化物的程序。在实验1中,六名受试者被反复暴露于16种刺激之下,对每种刺激的趋近行为被用于识别偏好刺激和非偏好刺激。在实验2中,我们通过在任意选定的反应出现时偶然给予偏好刺激和非偏好刺激,来检验它们的强化特性。结果显示,与基线条件或非偏好刺激条件相比,偏好刺激条件通常能产生更高的反应率,这表明该程序可用于评估行为技能有限的个体的强化物价值。

相似文献

1
Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.对重度智力迟钝个体的刺激偏好和强化物价值的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249-55. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249.
2
Sensory reinforcement of head turning with nonambulatory, profoundly mentally retarded persons.
Res Dev Disabil. 1987;8(3):413-26. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(87)90023-0.
3
Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.一项简短刺激偏好评估的评价
J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):605-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605.
4
A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.两种为重度和极重度残疾人士识别强化物方法的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.
5
Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences.识别重度残障人士的强化物:工作人员意见与偏好的系统评估
J Appl Behav Anal. 1988 Spring;21(1):31-43. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-31.
6
Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.强化物选择对发育障碍个体任务反应的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):411-22. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-411.
7
Auditory reinforcement in profoundly retarded multiply handicapped children.重度智力迟钝且多重残疾儿童的听觉强化训练
Am J Ment Defic. 1977 Nov;82(3):299-304.
8
On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.关于选择和差别性后果的相对强化作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):423-38. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-423.
9
Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers.对可变强化物与固定强化物偏好的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):451-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-451.
10
Reduction of stereotyped behavior in profoundly retarded individuals.减少重度智力迟钝个体的刻板行为。
Am J Ment Defic. 1977 Nov;82(3):238-45.

引用本文的文献

1
A Survey of Why and How Clinicians Change Reinforcers during Teaching Sessions.关于临床医生在教学过程中改变强化物的原因及方式的调查
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Aug 29;17(3):815-830. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00847-4. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Relationships between sensory processing patterns and metabolic risk factors among community dwelling people with metabolic syndrome: A cross-sectional and correlational research design.社区代谢综合征患者的感觉加工模式与代谢风险因素之间的关系:一项横断面和相关性研究设计。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0308421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308421. eCollection 2024.
3
Stimulus Avoidance Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review.刺激回避评估:一项系统的文献综述。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2024 Feb 26;47(1):139-166. doi: 10.1007/s40614-024-00398-1. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Efficacy of Edible and Leisure Reinforcers with Domestic Dogs.可食用和休闲强化物对家养犬的功效。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Sep 30;13(19):3073. doi: 10.3390/ani13193073.
5
A replication and extension of the augmented competing stimulus assessment.增强竞争刺激评估的复制与扩展
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023;56(4):869-883. doi: 10.1002/jaba.1009. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
6
Applied Behavior Analysis and the Abolitionist Neurodiversity Critique: An Ethical Analysis.应用行为分析与废奴主义神经多样性批判:一项伦理分析。
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Mar 2;16(4):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00780-6.
7
Pavlovian learning and conditioned reinforcement.巴甫洛夫式学习和条件强化。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Jun;56(3):498-519. doi: 10.1002/jaba.1004. Epub 2023 May 31.
8
Efficacy of competing stimulus assessments: A summary of 35 consecutively encountered cases.竞争刺激评估的疗效:35 例连续病例的总结。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Apr;56(2):428-441. doi: 10.1002/jaba.979. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
9
Dynamic Assessment of AAC Action Verb Symbols for Children with ASD.自闭症谱系障碍儿童辅助沟通行动动词符号的动态评估
Adv Neurodev Disord. 2023 Jan 3:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s41252-022-00312-3.
10
Teaching the History of Applied Behavior Analysis.讲授应用行为分析史
Perspect Behav Sci. 2022 Aug 12;45(4):757-774. doi: 10.1007/s40614-022-00354-x. eCollection 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis.应用行为分析的一些当前维度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):91-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91.
2
Reduction in rate of multiple tics by free operant conditioning methods.通过自由操作条件反射方法降低多发性抽动的发生率。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1962 Sep;135:187-95.
3
Reinforcer variation: implications for motivating developmentally disabled children.强化物变化:对激励发育障碍儿童的启示
J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Fall;14(3):345-50. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-345.
4
The limits and motivating potential of sensory stimuli as reinforcers for autistic children.作为自闭症儿童强化物的感觉刺激的局限性和激励潜力。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Fall;14(3):339-43. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-339.
5
A comparison of two procedures for programming the differential reinforcement of other behaviors.两种对其他行为进行差别强化编程程序的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1983 Winter;16(4):435-45. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1983.16-435.
6
Some motivational properties of sensory stimulation in psychotic children.精神病儿童感觉刺激的一些动机特性。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1977 Oct;24(2):312-23. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(77)90009-1.
7
Evaluation of entertainment materials for severely retarded persons.
Am J Ment Defic. 1977 Jan;81(4):357-61.