Comparison of film, hard copy computed radiography (CR) and soft copy picture archiving and communication (PACS) systems using a contrast detail test object.

This paper describes two experiments where a widely available test object (FAXIL TO20) was used to compare film, hard copy computed radiography (CR) and soft copy picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) images. Baseline images were produced with a fixed mAs. All images were scored by four experienced medical physicists. Contrast detail curves for the three types of images were almost identical. A second series of images was produced with the mAs varying from 1 mAs to 250 mAs. The contrast detail curves were plotted for each mAs value and the wider exposure latitude of CR compared with film was demonstrated. Use of PACS provided no further increase in exposure latitude. The density of the film images increased with mAs but the density of the CR hard copy images remained constant. It is of concern that the wider latitude of the CR images extends to exposures that are much higher than those used for film with no noticeable change in CR image density but with better images at higher exposures, because the potential exists for patient doses to increase. Hard copy CR images provide information about the exposure index which relates to the input dose to the plate and hence approximately to the dose to the patient. However, since such information is currently not available on default soft copy images, the authors suggest that all manufacturers of PACS should provide an indication of dose as a mandatory default setting.