Gutiérrez J, Guerrero M, Nuñez F, Soto M J, Piédrola G, Maroto M C
Microbiology Department, Granada University, Granada, Spain.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2000;14(1):20-6. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2825(2000)14:1<20::aid-jcla5>3.0.co;2-6.
We compared the antibodies to B. burgdorferi in three different populations in order to evaluate the diagnostic reliability of Lyme borreliosis serologic analysis. The subjects included 25 patients with Lyme borreliosis (Group 1); 50 patients with diseases of unknown cause, B. burgdorferi ELISA-positive in serum and without B. burgdorferi infection (Group 2); and 1,251 individuals without Lyme borreliosis (Group 3). All samples were tested for B. burgdorferi B31 and B. afzelii antigens using ELISA. The positive results of the ELISA B. burgdorferi B31 assay were confirmed with Western blot for the same strain. In Group 3, 162 (12.9%) patients were ELISA positive for B. burgdorferi B31, while only 6 (0.6%) patients had IgG ELISA antibodies to B afzelii. Bands in WB were detected in 104 (8.4%) of the Group 3 subjects. The bands found to be most reliable for the identification of strain B. burgdorferi B31 by IgG WB were those representing the 93, 39, 34, and 23-kDa proteins. Our results show that serologic diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis is far from clearly established. To date, the only reliable criteria are clinical ones correlated with laboratory evidence.
我们比较了三个不同人群中抗伯氏疏螺旋体的抗体,以评估莱姆病血清学分析的诊断可靠性。受试者包括25例莱姆病患者(第1组);50例病因不明、血清中伯氏疏螺旋体ELISA检测呈阳性且无伯氏疏螺旋体感染的患者(第2组);以及1251名无莱姆病的个体(第3组)。所有样本均使用ELISA检测伯氏疏螺旋体B31和阿氏疏螺旋体抗原。ELISA检测伯氏疏螺旋体B31的阳性结果用同一菌株的western blot进行确认。在第3组中,162例(12.9%)患者伯氏疏螺旋体B31的ELISA检测呈阳性,而只有6例(0.6%)患者有抗阿氏疏螺旋体的IgG ELISA抗体。第3组中有104例(8.4%)受试者在western blot中检测到条带。通过IgG western blot鉴定伯氏疏螺旋体B31菌株最可靠的条带是代表93、39、34和23 kDa蛋白的条带。我们的结果表明,莱姆病的血清学诊断远未明确确立。迄今为止,唯一可靠的标准是与实验室证据相关的临床标准。