Pfeifer M A, Samols E, Wolter C F, Winkler C F
South Med J. 1979 Feb;72(2):149-54. doi: 10.1097/00007611-197902000-00012.
The effects of low-dose continuous insulin therapy were compared to those of high-dose subcutaneous and intravenous insulin therapy in six episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis. Time for correction of acidosis, ketosis, and hyperglycemia were similar for both regimens. The high-dose method required more exogenous glucose and supplemental potassium to avoid hypoglycemia and/or hypokalemia during treatment. Levels of cortisol, human growth hormone, and glucagon, initially elevated in most patients, showed a progressive decline with both modes of therapy. Plasma insulin remained remarkably stable during both treatment regimens, but remained within the physiologic range only in patients receiving low-dose therapy. Our study suggest that either modality is effective in the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis.
在六例糖尿病酮症酸中毒病例中,对小剂量持续胰岛素治疗的效果与大剂量皮下及静脉胰岛素治疗的效果进行了比较。两种治疗方案纠正酸中毒、酮症及高血糖的时间相似。大剂量治疗方法在治疗期间需要更多的外源性葡萄糖和补充钾,以避免低血糖和/或低钾血症。大多数患者最初升高的皮质醇、人类生长激素和胰高血糖素水平,在两种治疗方式下均呈逐渐下降趋势。在两种治疗方案中,血浆胰岛素均保持显著稳定,但仅在接受小剂量治疗的患者中保持在生理范围内。我们的研究表明,两种治疗方式在糖尿病酮症酸中毒的治疗中均有效。