• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲与美国骨质疏松症诊疗指南比较

Comparison of the European and USA practice guidelines for Osteoporosis.

作者信息

Kanis J A, Torgerson D, Cooper C

机构信息

Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases (WHO Collaborating Centre), University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Jan-Feb;11(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/s1043-2760(99)00214-3.

DOI:10.1016/s1043-2760(99)00214-3
PMID:10652503
Abstract

The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease (EFFO), the Royal College of Physicians, the European Community and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA (NOF) have recently published guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. All adopt case-finding strategies but the conceptual approach between the European and North American guidelines differs fundamentally. This gives rise to differences in the populations identified for assessment and treatment.

摘要

欧洲骨质疏松和骨病基金会(EFFO)、皇家内科医师学院、欧洲共同体以及美国国家骨质疏松基金会(NOF)最近发布了骨质疏松症诊断和管理指南。所有指南都采用病例发现策略,但欧洲和北美指南的概念方法存在根本差异。这导致在确定进行评估和治疗的人群方面存在差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the European and USA practice guidelines for Osteoporosis.欧洲与美国骨质疏松症诊疗指南比较
Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Jan-Feb;11(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/s1043-2760(99)00214-3.
2
Osteoporosis: therapeutic guidelines. Guidelines for practice management of osteoporosis.骨质疏松症:治疗指南。骨质疏松症实践管理指南。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;56(4):694-702. doi: 10.1097/01.grf.0000437016.19989.61.
3
Osteoporosis Management in a Real Clinical Setting: Heterogeneity in Intervention Approach and Discrepancy in Treatment Rates when Compared with the NOGG and NOF Guidelines.真实临床环境中的骨质疏松症管理:与NOGG和NOF指南相比,干预方法的异质性及治疗率的差异
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2016 Sep;124(8):466-473. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-107671. Epub 2016 May 24.
4
Harmonization of clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis and osteopenia in Europe: a difficult challenge.欧洲骨质疏松症和骨质减少症预防与治疗临床实践指南的协调统一:一项艰巨挑战。
Calcif Tissue Int. 1996;59 Suppl 1:S24-9. doi: 10.1007/s002239900172.
5
Guidelines on the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk in Poland of III Central European Congress on Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis, XV Congress of the Polish Osteoarthrology Society and Polish Foundation of Osteoporosis.第三届中欧骨质疏松与骨关节炎大会、波兰骨关节炎学会第十五届大会及波兰骨质疏松基金会发布的《波兰骨质疏松症诊断与骨折风险评估指南》
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2010 Mar-Apr;12(2):194-200.
6
Disparate outcomes from applying U.K. and U.S. osteoporosis treatment guidelines.应用英国和美国骨质疏松治疗指南的结果存在差异。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Apr;95(4):1856-60. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-2157. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
7
[Recommendations of FRAX in clinical assessment of osteoporosis indicated in European and US guidelines].[欧洲和美国指南中FRAX在骨质疏松症临床评估中的推荐意见]
Clin Calcium. 2009 Dec;19(12):1723-8.
8
[The 'Osteoporosis' guideline of the Dutch College of General Practitioners; response from family practice].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Jul 31;143(31):1597-9.
9
[Treatment of osteoporosis according to the "European Guidance 2008". Fracture-oriented--economical--cost-effective].[依据《2008年欧洲指南》治疗骨质疏松症。以骨折为导向——经济——性价比高]
Internist (Berl). 2008 Sep;49(9):1126-36. doi: 10.1007/s00108-008-2192-y.
10
Impact of the NOGG and NOF Guidelines on the Indication of Bone Mineral Density in Routine Clinical Practice.NOGG和NOF指南对常规临床实践中骨密度指征的影响。
J Clin Densitom. 2015 Oct-Dec;18(4):533-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Osteoporosis Clinical Risk Assessment Tools in Postmenopausal Women Aged 50-64.绝经后 50-64 岁女性骨质疏松临床风险评估工具的比较评估
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2024 Dec 1;24(4):377-384.
2
Identifying and managing patients at high risk for fractures: conclusions from the second Spanish multidisciplinary forum-parathyroid hormone use in osteoporotic patients at high risk for fractures.识别和管理骨折高危患者:来自第二次西班牙多学科论坛的结论-甲状旁腺激素在骨折高危骨质疏松患者中的应用。
Drugs R D. 2012 Dec 1;12(4):199-206. doi: 10.2165/11641360-000000000-00000.
3
A comparison of case-finding strategies in the UK for the management of hip fractures.
英国髋关节骨折管理中病例发现策略的比较。
Osteoporos Int. 2012 Mar;23(3):907-15. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1864-y. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
4
The utility and limitations of FRAX: A US perspective.FRAX 的效用和局限性:美国视角。
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2010 Dec;8(4):192-7. doi: 10.1007/s11914-010-0032-1.
5
Bone physiology, disease and treatment: towards disease system analysis in osteoporosis.骨骼生理学、疾病与治疗:向骨质疏松症的疾病系统分析发展。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49(2):89-118. doi: 10.2165/11318150-000000000-00000.
6
Determinant factors of osteoporosis patients' reported therapeutic adherence to calcium and/or vitamin D supplements: a cross-sectional, observational study of postmenopausal women.骨质疏松症患者报告的钙和/或维生素 D 补充剂治疗依从性的决定因素:一项绝经后妇女的横断面、观察性研究。
Drugs Aging. 2009;26(10):861-9. doi: 10.2165/11317070-000000000-00000.
7
Incidence and costs of hip fractures compared to acute myocardial infarction in the Italian population: a 4-year survey.意大利人群中髋部骨折与急性心肌梗死的发病率及成本:一项为期4年的调查。
Osteoporos Int. 2007 Feb;18(2):211-9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0224-9. Epub 2006 Oct 24.
8
Which screening strategy using BMD measurements would be most cost effective for hip fracture prevention in elderly women? A decision analysis based on a Markov model.对于老年女性预防髋部骨折而言,哪种使用骨密度测量的筛查策略最具成本效益?基于马尔可夫模型的决策分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2007 Feb;18(2):143-51. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0227-6. Epub 2006 Oct 13.
9
Selecting patients for osteoporosis therapy.为骨质疏松症治疗选择患者。
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2006 Sep;4(3):91-5. doi: 10.1007/s11914-996-0027-0.
10
An audit of bone densitometry practice with reference to ISCD, IOF and NOF guidelines.参照国际临床骨密度学会(ISCD)、国际骨质疏松基金会(IOF)和美国国家骨质疏松基金会(NOF)指南对骨密度测量实践进行的一项审核。
Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(7):1111-5. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0101-6. Epub 2006 May 3.