Eisenberg N, Fabes R A, Guthrie I K, Reiser M
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287-1104, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Jan;78(1):136-57. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.1.136.
Individual differences in emotionality and regulation are central to conceptions of temperament and personality. In this article, conceptions of emotionality and regulation and ways in which they predict social functioning are examined. Linear (including additive) and nonlinear effects are reviewed. In addition, data on mediational and moderational relations from a longitudinal study are presented. The effects of attention regulation on social functioning were mediated by resiliency, and this relation was moderated by negative emotionality at the first, but not second, assessment. Negative emotionality moderated the relation of behavior regulation to socially appropriate/prosocial behavior. These results highlight the importance of examining different types of regulation and the ways in which dispositional characteristics interact in predicting social outcomes.
情绪性和调节方面的个体差异是气质和人格概念的核心。在本文中,我们将审视情绪性和调节的概念以及它们预测社会功能的方式。我们将回顾线性(包括累加性)和非线性效应。此外,还将呈现一项纵向研究中关于中介和调节关系的数据。注意力调节对社会功能的影响通过复原力起中介作用,并且在首次评估而非第二次评估时,这种关系受到消极情绪性的调节。消极情绪性调节了行为调节与社会适宜/亲社会行为之间的关系。这些结果凸显了考察不同类型调节以及气质特征在预测社会结果中相互作用方式的重要性。