Suppr超能文献

脂肪团治疗:神话还是现实:两种疗法(机械滚轴按摩疗法和氨茶碱乳膏)的前瞻性随机对照试验

Cellulite treatment: a myth or reality: a prospective randomized, controlled trial of two therapies, endermologie and aminophylline cream.

作者信息

Collis N, Elliot L A, Sharpe C, Sharpe D T

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Bradford Royal Infirmary, West Yorkshire, England, UK.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Sep;104(4):1110-4; discussion 1115-7.

Abstract

Cellulite is a common phenomenon that particularly affects the thighs and buttocks of women. Little scientific evidence exists to support any of the many advertised treatments for it. A total of 52 of 69 women, who were divided into three groups, completed a 12-week, randomized, controlled trial in which the effectiveness of two different treatments for cellulite was assessed. The patients acted as their own controls. The treatments investigated were twice-daily application of aminophylline cream and twice-weekly treatment with Endermologie ES1. Group 1 (double blind) received aminophylline to one thigh/buttock and a placebo cream to the other. Group 2 (singly blind) received Endermologie to one thigh/buttock. Group 3 received Endermologie to both sides and used the same cream regimen as group 1. Results were assessed subjectively by the patient and by clinical examination and photographic assessment by the surgeon (before and after the trial). Morphologic assessment included body mass index, thigh girth at two points, and thigh fat depth measurement by ultrasound. No statistical difference existed in measurements between legs for any of the treatment groups (paired t test, p > 0.4). The best subjective assessment, by the patients themselves, revealed that only 3 of 35 aminophylline-treated legs and 10 of 35 Endermologie-treated legs had their cellulite appearance improved. The authors do not believe that either of these two treatments is effective in improving the appearance of cellulite.

摘要

橘皮组织是一种常见现象,尤其会影响女性的大腿和臀部。几乎没有科学证据支持众多广告宣传的针对橘皮组织的治疗方法。69名女性被分为三组,其中52人完成了一项为期12周的随机对照试验,该试验评估了两种不同橘皮组织治疗方法的有效性。患者自身作为对照。所研究的治疗方法为每日两次涂抹氨茶碱乳膏以及每周两次接受Endermologie ES1治疗。第1组(双盲)一侧大腿/臀部涂抹氨茶碱,另一侧涂抹安慰剂乳膏。第2组(单盲)一侧大腿/臀部接受Endermologie治疗。第3组双侧均接受Endermologie治疗,并采用与第1组相同的乳膏使用方案。结果由患者主观评估,并由外科医生在试验前后进行临床检查和照片评估。形态学评估包括体重指数、大腿两点处的周长以及通过超声测量大腿脂肪深度。任何治疗组的双腿测量结果均无统计学差异(配对t检验,p>0.4)。患者自身给出的最佳主观评估显示,接受氨茶碱治疗的35条腿中只有3条、接受Endermologie治疗的35条腿中只有10条的橘皮组织外观得到改善。作者认为这两种治疗方法均无法有效改善橘皮组织的外观。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验