Niehaus L, Meyer B U, Weyh T
Neurologische Kliniken der Charité, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Jan;111(1):75-80. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00198-4.
This paper describes the influence of pulse configuration and current direction on the excitation of the hand-associated motor cortex and the median nerve by magnetic stimulation. Monophasic and biphasic current pulses with the same peak rise time of 80 micros and a maximum rate of current change (dI/dt) were discharged through an eight-shaped coil of the stimulator used (Dantec MagPro). Two current directions with opposite orientation in the coil axis were studied.
(1) for both, cortex and nerve stimulation, biphasic stimuli were more effective and elicited compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) with lower thresholds and larger amplitudes. (2) Using biphasic pulses the direction of the currents in the first phase of the pulse did not influence the CMAP amplitude. (3) Using monophasic pulses induced currents oriented postero-anteriorly in the motor cortex or orthodromically along the nerve axis elicited larger CMAPs than currents in the opposite orientation. (4) Pulse configuration did not influence the CMAP-latencies and by this the stimulation site (cortex, nerve).
Monophasic stimuli are useful to investigate excitation effects which are dependent on the current direction. The application of biphasic stimuli with their stronger excitation effects might be advantageous when patients with high cortical thresholds or deep lying nerves shall be investigated.
本文描述了脉冲形态和电流方向对通过磁刺激激发手部相关运动皮层和正中神经的影响。使用(丹泰克MagPro)刺激器的8字形线圈释放具有相同80微秒峰值上升时间和最大电流变化率(dI/dt)的单相和双相电流脉冲。研究了线圈轴线上两个相反方向的电流。
(1)对于皮层和神经刺激,双相刺激更有效,能以更低阈值和更大幅度诱发复合肌肉动作电位(CMAP)。(2)使用双相脉冲时,脉冲第一阶段电流方向不影响CMAP幅度。(3)使用单相脉冲时,在运动皮层中向后 - 向前定向或沿神经轴正向传导的感应电流比相反方向的电流诱发的CMAP更大。(4)脉冲形态不影响CMAP潜伏期,因此也不影响刺激部位(皮层、神经)。
单相刺激对于研究依赖于电流方向的激发效应很有用。当研究皮层阈值高或神经位置深的患者时,应用具有更强激发效应的双相刺激可能具有优势。