• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口服环丙沙星与静脉注射头孢曲松用于低风险儿科肿瘤患者门诊发热和中性粒细胞减少症的治疗:随机前瞻性试验

Oral ciprofloxacin vs. intravenous ceftriaxone administered in an outpatient setting for fever and neutropenia in low-risk pediatric oncology patients: randomized prospective trial.

作者信息

Petrilli A S, Dantas L S, Campos M C, Tanaka C, Ginani V C, Seber A

机构信息

Pediatric Oncology Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Med Pediatr Oncol. 2000 Feb;34(2):87-91. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-911x(200002)34:2<87::aid-mpo2>3.0.co;2-f.

DOI:10.1002/(sici)1096-911x(200002)34:2<87::aid-mpo2>3.0.co;2-f
PMID:10657866
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infections are one of the major complications in children undergoing chemotherapy. Monotherapy with either ciprofloxacin or ceftriaxone is safe and efficient in low-risk patients (solid tumors and stage I/II lymphomas). The same drugs may be used in an outpatient setting, decreasing costs and the risk of nosocomial infections.

PROCEDURE

Low-risk patients (N = 70) with episodes of fever and neutropenia (N = 116) were randomized to receive either oral ciprofloxacin or intravenous ceftriaxone as outpatients. Only one patient had a central venous catheter.

RESULTS

Episodes of fever and neutropenia were classified as fever of unknown origin (41% vs. 32%) or clinically documented infection (56% vs. 63%) in the ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone groups, respectively. Most of these infections were of upper respiratory tract, skin, or gastrointestinal origin. The mean duration of neutropenia was 5 vs. 6 days. Fever persisted for 1-9 days (mean 2 vs. 3 days). Therapy was successful with no modifications in 83% vs. 75% of the episodes. Patients were admitted in 7% vs. 4% of the episodes. No bone or joint side effects were seen in either group. All patients survived.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient therapy with either oral ciprofloxacin or intravenous ceftriaxone for fever and neutropenia is effective and safe in pediatric patients with solid tumors and stage I/II non-Hodgkin lymphoma (low-risk patients).

摘要

背景

感染是接受化疗儿童的主要并发症之一。对于低风险患者(实体瘤和Ⅰ/Ⅱ期淋巴瘤),单用环丙沙星或头孢曲松治疗是安全有效的。这些药物可在门诊使用,从而降低成本和医院感染风险。

程序

将70例有发热和中性粒细胞减少发作的低风险患者(共116次发作)随机分为两组,门诊患者分别接受口服环丙沙星或静脉注射头孢曲松治疗。只有1例患者有中心静脉导管。

结果

环丙沙星组和头孢曲松组中,发热和中性粒细胞减少发作分别被分类为不明原因发热(41%对32%)或临床确诊感染(56%对63%)。这些感染大多源于上呼吸道、皮肤或胃肠道。中性粒细胞减少的平均持续时间分别为5天和6天。发热持续1 - 9天(平均分别为2天和3天)。83%和75%的发作在未调整治疗的情况下获得成功。发作期间住院的患者比例分别为7%和4%。两组均未出现骨或关节副作用。所有患者均存活。

结论

对于实体瘤和Ⅰ/Ⅱ期非霍奇金淋巴瘤的儿科患者(低风险患者),口服环丙沙星或静脉注射头孢曲松进行门诊治疗发热和中性粒细胞减少是有效且安全的。

相似文献

1
Oral ciprofloxacin vs. intravenous ceftriaxone administered in an outpatient setting for fever and neutropenia in low-risk pediatric oncology patients: randomized prospective trial.口服环丙沙星与静脉注射头孢曲松用于低风险儿科肿瘤患者门诊发热和中性粒细胞减少症的治疗:随机前瞻性试验
Med Pediatr Oncol. 2000 Feb;34(2):87-91. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-911x(200002)34:2<87::aid-mpo2>3.0.co;2-f.
2
Oral ciprofloxacin in the management of children with cancer with lower risk febrile neutropenia.口服环丙沙星用于治疗低危发热性中性粒细胞减少症的癌症患儿。
Cancer. 2001 Apr 15;91(8):1563-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:8<1563::aid-cncr1166>3.0.co;2-c.
3
Domiciliary treatment of febrile episodes in cancer patients: a prospective randomized trial comparing oral versus parenteral empirical antibiotic treatment.癌症患者发热发作的家庭治疗:一项比较口服与胃肠外经验性抗生素治疗的前瞻性随机试验。
Support Care Cancer. 1999 May;7(3):134-9. doi: 10.1007/s005200050243.
4
Ceftriaxone in the outpatient treatment of cancer patients with fever and neutropenia.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 Jul;17(7):501-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01691133.
5
Outpatient treatment of fever and neutropenia for low risk pediatric cancer patients.低风险儿科癌症患者发热和中性粒细胞减少的门诊治疗。
Cancer. 1999 Jul 1;86(1):126-34.
6
Oral moxifloxacin or intravenous ceftriaxone for the treatment of low-risk neutropenic fever in cancer patients suitable for early hospital discharge.口服莫西沙星或静脉注射头孢曲松用于治疗适合早期出院的癌症患者低风险中性粒细胞减少性发热。
Support Care Cancer. 2008 Sep;16(9):1017-23. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0383-z. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
7
Outpatient, sequential, parenteral-oral antibiotic therapy for lower risk febrile neutropenia in children with malignant disease: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial in Argentina.门诊序贯胃肠外-口服抗生素治疗恶性疾病患儿低风险发热性中性粒细胞减少症:阿根廷一项单中心随机对照试验
Cancer. 2003 Apr 1;97(7):1775-80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11251.
8
A double-blind comparison of empirical oral and intravenous antibiotic therapy for low-risk febrile patients with neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy.癌症化疗期间低风险发热性中性粒细胞减少患者经验性口服与静脉抗生素治疗的双盲比较
N Engl J Med. 1999 Jul 29;341(5):305-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199907293410501.
9
Outpatient therapy with oral ofloxacin for patients with low risk neutropenia and fever: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.口服氧氟沙星用于低风险中性粒细胞减少症和发热患者的门诊治疗:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Cancer. 1999 Jan 1;85(1):213-9.
10
Ceftriaxone monotherapy in the treatment of low-risk febrile neutropenia.头孢曲松单药治疗低风险发热性中性粒细胞减少症。
Chemotherapy. 1998 Sep-Oct;44(5):343-54. doi: 10.1159/000007134.

引用本文的文献

1
Successful Management of Pediatric Patients with Low-Risk Febrile Neutropenia Using a Clinical Care Pathway in Egypt.在埃及采用临床护理路径成功管理低风险发热性中性粒细胞减少症的儿科患者
Infect Chemother. 2025 Jun;57(2):288-295. doi: 10.3947/ic.2025.0009. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
2
Efficacy of oral levofloxacin monotherapy against low-risk FN in patients with malignant lymphoma who received chemotherapy using the CHOP regimen.口服左氧氟沙星单药治疗接受 CHOP 方案化疗的恶性淋巴瘤低危 FN 患者的疗效。
J Clin Exp Hematop. 2020 Sep 25;60(3):73-77. doi: 10.3960/jslrt.20008. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
3
Outpatient treatment for people with cancer who develop a low-risk febrile neutropaenic event.
对发生低风险发热性中性粒细胞减少事件的癌症患者进行门诊治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 19;3(3):CD009031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009031.pub2.
4
Clinical relevance of molecular identification of microorganisms and detection of antimicrobial resistance genes in bloodstream infections of paediatric cancer patients.小儿癌症患者血流感染中微生物分子鉴定及抗菌药物耐药基因检测的临床相关性
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 1;16(1):462. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1792-8.
5
Gastrointestinal and liver infections in children undergoing antineoplastic chemotherapy in the years 2000.2000年接受抗肿瘤化疗儿童的胃肠道和肝脏感染
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul 7;22(25):5853-66. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i25.5853.
6
Systematic review of reduced therapy regimens for children with low risk febrile neutropenia.低危发热性中性粒细胞减少症患儿简化治疗方案的系统评价
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jun;24(6):2651-60. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3074-9. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
7
Statewide Longitudinal Hospital Use and Charges for Pediatric and Adolescent Patients With Cancer.全州范围内癌症患儿和青少年患者的纵向医院使用情况及费用
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Jul;11(4):e468-75. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.003590. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
8
Oral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients.癌症患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症的口服与静脉抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 9;2013(10):CD003992. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003992.pub3.
9
Developing a national 'low risk' febrile neutropenia framework for use in children and young people's cancer care.制定国家“低风险”发热性中性粒细胞减少症框架,用于儿童和青少年癌症护理。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 May;21(5):1241-51. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1653-y. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
10
Outpatient and oral antibiotic management of low-risk febrile neutropenia are effective in children--a systematic review of prospective trials.儿童低危中性粒细胞减少性发热采用门诊和口服抗生素管理是有效的——一项前瞻性试验的系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Jun;20(6):1135-45. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1425-8. Epub 2012 Mar 9.