Suppr超能文献

对接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者进行的常规静脉胆管造影和选择性内镜逆行胆管造影(无论有无术中胆管造影)的五年前瞻性审计。

Five-year prospective audit of routine intravenous cholangiography and selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with or without intraoperative cholangiography in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Pietra N, Sarli L, Maccarini P U, Sabadini G, Costi R, Gobbi S

机构信息

Institute of General Surgery, University of Parma, School of Medicine, Via Gramsci n. 14, 43100 Parma, Italy.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2000 Mar;24(3):345-52. doi: 10.1007/s002689910055.

Abstract

Consensus has never been reached regarding the need or the imaging technique for evaluating the common bile duct (CBD) in patients considered for cholecystectomy. With the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy there has been a resurgence of interest in the role of preoperative intravenous cholangiography (IVC) as an alternative for evaluating the CBD. The purpose of this audit was to assess whether a diagnostic workup based on IVC, which permits selective use of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) and endoscopic treatment of CBD stones before surgery, could be useful in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). In patients without jaundice, gallstone pancreatitis, a prior diagnosis of CBD stones, a prior history of contrast allergy, or a risk of contrast-associated acute renal failure, IVC was performed routinely. Patients suspected to have CBD stones based on IVC results or with inconclusive IVC and patients with a strong clinical suspicion of CBD stones were referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). IOC was carried out in patients who had a history of contrast allergy or risk of contrast-associated acute renal failure and whenever the surgeon was in doubt as to the biliary anatomy or CBD clearance. IVC was carried out in 1155 patients, ERC in 225, and IOC in 54. IVC was conclusive in 1132 patients, with a diagnostic accuracy of 99%. Our workup permitted the sequential endoscopic-laparoscopic treatment of cholecystocholedocholithiasis in 162 cases. During the follow-up period residual CBD stones were detected in four patients. Our diagnostic workup showed that routine IVC exposes the population to a large radiation burden, and the cost is high for the small number of patients who benefit. Moreover, it does not seem helpful in reducing the incidence of CBD injuries during LC.

摘要

对于考虑行胆囊切除术的患者,在是否需要以及采用何种成像技术评估胆总管(CBD)方面,尚未达成共识。随着腹腔镜胆囊切除术的出现,术前静脉胆管造影(IVC)作为评估CBD的一种替代方法,再次引起了人们的关注。本次审计的目的是评估基于IVC的诊断检查方法是否对接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的患者有用,该方法允许在手术前选择性地使用术中胆管造影(IOC)以及对CBD结石进行内镜治疗。对于无黄疸、胆石性胰腺炎、既往诊断为CBD结石、既往有造影剂过敏史或有造影剂相关急性肾衰竭风险的患者,常规进行IVC。根据IVC结果怀疑有CBD结石或IVC结果不确定的患者以及临床高度怀疑有CBD结石的患者,转诊接受内镜逆行胆管造影(ERC)。有造影剂过敏史或有造影剂相关急性肾衰竭风险的患者,以及外科医生对胆管解剖结构或CBD清除情况存疑时,进行IOC。1155例患者进行了IVC,225例进行了ERC,54例进行了IOC。1132例患者的IVC结果明确,诊断准确率为99%。我们的检查方法允许对162例胆囊胆总管结石患者进行序贯性内镜-腹腔镜治疗。在随访期间,4例患者检测到残留的CBD结石。我们的诊断检查表明,常规IVC使人群承受了较大的辐射负担,且对少数受益患者的成本较高。此外,它似乎无助于降低LC期间CBD损伤的发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验