Suppr超能文献

北卡罗来纳州和弗吉尼亚州患病犬中犬埃立克体、马埃立克体和瑞氏埃立克体的血清阳性率。

Seroprevalence of Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia equi, and Ehrlichia risticii in sick dogs from North Carolina and Virginia.

作者信息

Suksawat J, Hegarty B C, Breitschwerdt E B

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27606, USA.

出版信息

J Vet Intern Med. 2000 Jan-Feb;14(1):50-5. doi: 10.1892/0891-6640(2000)014<0050:socear>2.3.co;2.

Abstract

Ehrlichia canis, E. equi, and E. risticii seroprevalence was determined by microimmunofluorescent antibody testing (IFA) in a sequential population of 1,845 sick dogs admitted during a 1-year period to the North Carolina State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital. A seroreactor was defined by a reciprocal IFA titer of > or =80 to E. canis, E. equi, or E. risticii antigens. Of the 48 IFA seroreactors, 44 dogs were seroreactive to E. canis, 21 to E. equi, and 0 to E. risticii. Seventeen dogs reacted to both E. canis and E. equi antigens. There was concordance of E. canis IFA and western immunoblot (WI) test results for 36/44 dogs. Because of cross-reactivity of E. canis sera with E. equi antigens, WI was of less utility to confirm E. equi exposure. After elimination of E. canis seroreactors, there was concordance of 2/4 E. equi IFA and WI test results. Based upon a retrospective review of medical records, ehrlichiosis was diagnosed in 10/48 (21%) IFA seroreactive dogs, 9 of which were confirmed positive by WI. Of the remaining 38 IFA seroreactors, 29 also were confirmed by E. canis or E. equi WI. These results indicate that (1) ehrlichiosis was not diagnosed in the majority of serologically confirmed cases, (2) based upon E. canis and E. equi WI analysis, IFA testing was not specific (21% false positive), (3) E. canis sera cross-react with E. equi antigens, and (4) serologic evidence of E. risticii infection was lacking in the dog population studied.

摘要

采用微量免疫荧光抗体检测(IFA)法,对北卡罗来纳州立大学兽医教学医院在1年期间收治的1845只患病犬进行连续检测,以确定犬埃立克体、马埃立克体和瑞氏埃立克体的血清流行率。血清反应阳性者定义为对犬埃立克体、马埃立克体或瑞氏埃立克体抗原的IFA效价≥80。在48只IFA血清反应阳性犬中,44只对犬埃立克体呈血清反应阳性,21只对马埃立克体呈血清反应阳性,对瑞氏埃立克体呈血清反应阳性的犬为0只。17只犬对犬埃立克体和马埃立克体抗原均有反应。在44只犬中,有36只犬的犬埃立克体IFA检测结果与western免疫印迹(WI)检测结果一致。由于犬埃立克体血清与马埃立克体抗原存在交叉反应,WI在确认马埃立克体感染方面的效用较小。剔除犬埃立克体血清反应阳性犬后,4只马埃立克体IFA检测阳性犬中有2只的IFA检测结果与WI检测结果一致。根据病历回顾性分析,在48只IFA血清反应阳性犬中有10只(21%)被诊断为埃立克体病,其中9只经WI检测确诊为阳性。在其余38只IFA血清反应阳性犬中,有29只也经犬埃立克体或马埃立克体WI检测确诊。这些结果表明:(1)在大多数血清学确诊病例中未诊断出埃立克体病;(2)根据犬埃立克体和马埃立克体WI分析,IFA检测不具有特异性(假阳性率为21%);(3)犬埃立克体血清与马埃立克体抗原存在交叉反应;(4)在所研究的犬群中缺乏瑞氏埃立克体感染的血清学证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验