Meehan T, Vermeer C, Windsor C
Nursing Research Unit, Wolston Park Hospital, Wacol, Queensland, Australia.
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Feb;31(2):370-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01289.x.
Twelve patients receiving acute in-patient psychiatric care in Queensland, Australia, participated in semi-structured interviews to elicit their perceptions of seclusion. All respondents had experienced time in seclusion within the 7 days prior to interview. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed using content analysis. Five major themes emerged: use of seclusion, emotional impact, sensory deprivation, maintaining control and staff-patient interaction. The prevailing negativity towards seclusion underscores the need for ongoing critical review of its use. In particular, the relationship between patient responses to seclusion and the circumstances in which seclusion takes place requires greater consideration. Interventions such as providing information to patients about seclusion, increased interaction with patients during seclusion, attention to privacy and effective debriefing following seclusion may help to reduce the emotional impact of the practice.
在澳大利亚昆士兰州接受急性住院精神科护理的12名患者参与了半结构化访谈,以了解他们对隔离的看法。所有受访者在访谈前7天内都有过被隔离的经历。访谈进行了录音、转录,并采用内容分析法进行分析。出现了五个主要主题:隔离的使用、情感影响、感觉剥夺、维持控制以及医护人员与患者的互动。对隔离普遍存在的负面态度凸显了对其使用情况进行持续严格审查的必要性。特别是,患者对隔离的反应与隔离发生的环境之间的关系需要更多的考虑。诸如向患者提供有关隔离的信息、在隔离期间增加与患者的互动、关注隐私以及隔离后进行有效的汇报等干预措施,可能有助于减少这种做法的情感影响。