Suppr超能文献

健康人的睡眠——一项日记式研究。

The sleep of healthy people--a diary study.

作者信息

Monk T H, Buysse D J, Rose L R, Hall J A, Kupfer D J

机构信息

Sleep and Chronobiology Center, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA, USA.

出版信息

Chronobiol Int. 2000 Jan;17(1):49-60. doi: 10.1081/cbi-100101031.

Abstract

To provide baseline data for various research studies at the University of Pittsburgh over a 10-year period, 266 healthy subjects (144 male, 122 female, aged 20-50 years) meeting certain criteria each completed a 14-night sleep diary. For each night, the diary allowed the subjective measurement of bedtime, wake time, time in bed (TIB), sleep efficiency, number of minutes of wake after sleep onset (WASO), alertness on awakening, and percentage of morning needing an alarm (or a person functioning as one). Weeknight versus weekend night differences in TIB (TIBdiff), weekday altertness, and reliance on alarms were examined as possible indicators of sleep debt. In addition, general descriptive data were tabulated. On average, bedtimes were at 23:48 and wake times at 07:23, yielding a mean TIB of 7 hours 35 minutes. As expected, bedtimes and wake times were later on weekend nights than on weeknights. Bedtimes were 26 minutes later, wake times 53 minutes later, yielding a mean weekend TIB increase of 27 minutes. Overall, subjects perceived their sleep latency to be 10.5 minutes, reported an average of one awakening during the night (with an average of 6.4 minutes of WASO), had a diary sleep efficiency of 96.3%, and awoke with an alterness rating of 69.5%. These variables differed little between weeknight and weekend nights. Subjects used an alarm (or a person functioning as an alarm) on 60.9% nights overall, 68.3% on weeknights, 42.5% on weekends. When TIBdiff was used as an estimate of sleep debt (comparing subjects with TIBdiff > 75 minutes with those with a TIBdiff < 30 minutes), the group with more "catch-up sleep" on weekends had shorter weeknight TIB durations (by about 24 minutes) and relied more on an alarm for weekday waking (by about 22%), indicating the possible utility of these variables as sleep debt indices.

摘要

为了给匹兹堡大学在10年期间开展的各项研究提供基线数据,266名符合特定标准的健康受试者(144名男性,122名女性,年龄在20至50岁之间)每人都完成了一份为期14晚的睡眠日记。对于每一晚,该日记允许对就寝时间、起床时间、卧床时间(TIB)、睡眠效率、睡眠开始后醒来的分钟数(WASO)、醒来时的警觉性以及早上需要闹钟(或起到闹钟作用的人)的百分比进行主观测量。研究了工作日与周末夜晚在TIB(TIBdiff)、工作日警觉性以及对闹钟的依赖方面的差异,将其作为睡眠债的可能指标。此外,还列出了一般描述性数据。平均而言,就寝时间为23:48,起床时间为07:23,平均TIB为7小时35分钟。正如预期的那样,周末夜晚的就寝时间和起床时间比工作日夜晚更晚。就寝时间晚26分钟,起床时间晚53分钟,周末的平均TIB增加了27分钟。总体而言,受试者认为他们的入睡潜伏期为10.5分钟,报告平均每晚醒来一次(平均WASO为6.4分钟),日记记录的睡眠效率为96.3%,醒来时的警觉评分为69.5%。这些变量在工作日夜晚和周末夜晚之间差异不大。受试者总体上在60.9%的夜晚使用闹钟(或起到闹钟作用的人),工作日夜晚为68.3%,周末为42.5%。当用TIBdiff作为睡眠债的估计值时(将TIBdiff>75分钟的受试者与TIBdiff<30分钟的受试者进行比较),周末有更多“补觉”的组工作日夜晚的TIB持续时间更短(约24分钟),并且在工作日醒来时对闹钟的依赖程度更高(约22%),这表明这些变量作为睡眠债指标可能具有实用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验