Suppr超能文献

不同方法识别呼吸紊乱对睡眠呼吸暂停评估的影响。

Effects of varying approaches for identifying respiratory disturbances on sleep apnea assessment.

作者信息

Redline S, Kapur V K, Sanders M H, Quan S F, Gottlieb D J, Rapoport D M, Bonekat W H, Smith P L, Kiley J P, Iber C

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-6003, USA.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Feb;161(2 Pt 1):369-74. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.2.9904031.

Abstract

Varying approaches to measuring the respiratory disturbance index (RDI) may lead to discrepant estimates of the severity of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). In this study, we assessed the impact of varying the use of corroborative data (presence and degree of desaturation and/or arousal) to identify hypopneas and apneas. The relationships among 10 RDIs defined by various definitions of apneas and hypopneas were assessed in 5,046 participants in the Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) who underwent overnight unattended 12-channel polysomnography (PSG). The magnitude of the median RDI varied 10-fold (i.e., 29.3 when the RDI was based on events identified on the basis of flow or volume amplitude criteria alone to 2.0 for an RDI that required an associated 5% desaturation with events). The correlation between RDIs based on different definitions ranged from 0.99 to 0.68. The highest correlations were among RDIs that required apneas and hypopneas to be associated with some level of desaturation. Lower correlations were observed between RDIs that required desaturation as compared with RDIs defined on the basis of amplitude criteria alone or associated arousal. These data suggest that different approaches for measuring the RDI may contribute to substantial variability in identification and classification of the disorder.

摘要

测量呼吸紊乱指数(RDI)的不同方法可能导致对睡眠呼吸紊乱(SDB)严重程度的估计存在差异。在本研究中,我们评估了改变使用确证数据(血氧饱和度降低和/或觉醒的存在及程度)来识别呼吸浅慢和呼吸暂停的影响。在睡眠心脏健康研究(SHHS)的5046名参与者中,评估了由呼吸暂停和呼吸浅慢的各种定义所定义的10种RDI之间的关系,这些参与者接受了无人值守的夜间12导多导睡眠图(PSG)检查。中位RDI的幅度变化了10倍(即,当RDI仅基于根据流量或容积幅度标准识别的事件时为29.3,而对于需要事件伴有5%血氧饱和度降低的RDI则为2.0)。基于不同定义的RDI之间的相关性范围为0.99至0.68。最高的相关性存在于要求呼吸暂停和呼吸浅慢与一定程度的血氧饱和度降低相关的RDI之间。与仅基于幅度标准定义的RDI或相关觉醒的RDI相比,要求血氧饱和度降低的RDI之间的相关性较低。这些数据表明,测量RDI的不同方法可能导致该疾病在识别和分类方面存在很大差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验