Suppr超能文献

在无人值守的家中与有医护人员在场的实验室环境中进行多导睡眠图监测——睡眠心脏健康研究方法。

Polysomnography performed in the unattended home versus the attended laboratory setting--Sleep Heart Health Study methodology.

作者信息

Iber Conrad, Redline Susan, Kaplan Gilpin Adele M, Quan Stuart F, Zhang Lin, Gottlieb Daniel J, Rapoport David, Resnick Helaine E, Sanders Mark, Smith Philip

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Sleep. 2004 May 1;27(3):536-40. doi: 10.1093/sleep/27.3.536.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare polysomnographic recordings obtained in the home and laboratory setting.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Multicenter study comparing unsupervised polysomnography performed in the participant's home with polysomnography supervised at an academic sleep disorders center, using a randomized sequence of study setting. Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) standardized polysomnographic recording and scoring techniques were used for both settings.

PARTICIPANTS

64 of 76 non-SHHS participants recruited from 7 SHHS field sites who had both a laboratory and home polysomnogram meeting acceptable quality criteria.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Median sleep duration was greater in the home than in the laboratory (375 vs 318 minutes, respectively, P < .0001) as was sleep efficiency (86% vs 82%, respectively, P < .0024). Very small, but significant increases in percentage of rapid eye movement sleep and decreases in stage 1 sleep were noted in the laboratory. Employing multiple definitions of respiratory disturbance index (RDI), median RDI was similar in both settings (for example, RDI with 3% desaturation: home 12.4, range 0.6-67; laboratory 9.5, range 0.1-93.4, P = .41). Quartile analysis of laboratory RDI showed moderate agreement with home RDI measurements. Based on the mean of laboratory and home RDI and using a cutpoint of 20, there was a biphasic distribution, with the RDI 3% above 20 being more common in the recordings performed in the laboratory than in the home and below 20 being more common in the recordings performed in the home than in the laboratory. These differences could not be attributed to quality of recording, age, sex, or body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

Using SHHS methodology, median RDI was similar in the unattended home and attended laboratory setting with differences of small magnitude in some sleep parameters. Differences in RDI between settings resulted in a rate of disease misclassification that is similar to repeated studies in the same setting.

摘要

研究目的

比较在家中和实验室环境下获得的多导睡眠图记录。

设计与背景

多中心研究,使用随机的研究环境顺序,比较参与者在家中进行的无监督多导睡眠图与在学术性睡眠障碍中心进行的有监督多导睡眠图。两种环境均采用睡眠心脏健康研究(SHHS)标准化的多导睡眠图记录和评分技术。

参与者

从7个SHHS现场招募的76名非SHHS参与者中的64名,他们的实验室和家中多导睡眠图均符合可接受的质量标准。

测量与结果

在家中的中位睡眠时间长于实验室(分别为375分钟和318分钟,P <.0001),睡眠效率也是如此(分别为86%和82%,P <.0024)。在实验室中,快速眼动睡眠百分比有非常小但显著的增加,1期睡眠有减少。采用多种呼吸紊乱指数(RDI)定义,两种环境下的中位RDI相似(例如,饱和度降低3%时的RDI:家中为12.4,范围0.6 - 67;实验室为9.5,范围0.1 - 93.4,P =.41)。实验室RDI的四分位数分析显示与家中RDI测量有中度一致性。基于实验室和家中RDI的平均值并使用20的切点,存在双相分布,RDI高于20的3%在实验室进行的记录中比在家中更常见,低于20的在家庭记录中比在实验室更常见。这些差异不能归因于记录质量、年龄、性别或体重指数。

结论

使用SHHS方法,无人在家和有监督的实验室环境下的中位RDI相似,一些睡眠参数存在小幅度差异。不同环境下RDI的差异导致疾病误诊率与在同一环境下重复研究相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验