Rossion B, Gauthier I, Tarr M J, Despland P, Bruyer R, Linotte S, Crommelinck M
Unité de Neuropsychologie Cognitive (NECO), UCL, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Neuroreport. 2000 Jan 17;11(1):69-74. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200001170-00014.
Behavioral studies have shown that picture-plane inversion impacts face and object recognition differently, thereby suggesting face-specific processing mechanisms in the human brain. Here we used event-related potentials to investigate the time course of this behavioral inversion effect in both faces and novel objects. ERPs were recorded for 14 subjects presented with upright and inverted visual categories, including human faces and novel objects (Greebles). A N170 was obtained for all categories of stimuli, including Greebles. However, only inverted faces delayed and enhanced N170 (bilaterally). These observations indicate that the N170 is not specific to faces, as has been previously claimed. In addition, the amplitude difference between faces and objects does not reflect face-specific mechanisms since it can be smaller than between non-face object categories. There do exist some early differences in the time-course of categorization for faces and non-faces across inversion. This may be attributed either to stimulus category per se (e.g. face-specific mechanisms) or to differences in the level of expertise between these categories.
行为学研究表明,图像平面反转对人脸和物体识别的影响有所不同,从而表明人类大脑中存在针对人脸的特定处理机制。在此,我们使用事件相关电位来研究这种行为反转效应在人脸和新物体中的时间进程。对14名受试者呈现直立和倒置的视觉类别(包括人脸和新物体“Greebles”)时记录事件相关电位。所有刺激类别(包括Greebles)均记录到N170。然而,只有倒置的人脸会延迟并增强N170(双侧)。这些观察结果表明,N170并不像之前所声称的那样是人脸特有的。此外,人脸和物体之间的振幅差异并不反映针对人脸的特定机制,因为它可能比非人脸物体类别之间的差异更小。在反转情况下,人脸和非人脸在分类时间进程上确实存在一些早期差异。这可能归因于刺激类别本身(例如针对人脸的特定机制),或者这些类别之间专业水平的差异。