Suppr超能文献

心脏病专家、内科医生、家庭医生及其他医生治疗的心力衰竭患者之间的差异:一项基于全州范围大型数据库的分析

Differences between patients with heart failure treated by cardiologists, internists, family physicians, and other physicians: analysis of a large, statewide database.

作者信息

Philbin E F, Jenkins P L

机构信息

Section of Heart Failure & Cardiac Transplantation, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2000 Mar;139(3):491-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(00)90093-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The management of heart failure (HF) by cardiologists may be better than that of other physicians in that cardiologists' treatment choices more frequently conform with published guidelines and the results of clinical trials. Whether cardiologists' management of HF is more or less cost-effective is up for debate.

METHODS

Information on all 1995 New York state hospital discharges assigned ICD-9-CM codes indicative of HF in the principal diagnosis position was obtained. Demographic and clinical characteristics, process of care, resource utilization, and short-term HF-related outcomes were compared between patients of cardiologists and patients of other physicians.

RESULTS

A total of 44,926 patients were identified, with 10,506 (23%) receiving care from cardiologists, 28,300 (63%) from internists, 4812 (11%) from family practitioners, and 1308 (3%) from other physicians. Patients of cardiologists were younger, more frequently male, and less frequently residents of nursing homes. They were more likely to have associated cardiovascular diagnoses but less likely to have comorbid general medical conditions. Patients of cardiologists were more likely to undergo cardiac catheterization (9%) than those of internists (3%) and family practice (2%) physicians but had similar adjusted hospital length of stay and charges. Mortality and hospital readmission rates for HF were similar among the groups. Patients in the "other" group (managed mostly by surgeons) were the youngest, underwent more invasive and cardiac surgical procedures, and had the longest length of stay and highest hospital charges.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiologists' management of HF is not economically disadvantageous. The relations among physician specialty, process of care, resource utilization, and clinical outcomes require further study before rational and evidence-based health care staffing recommendations can be formulated.

摘要

背景

心脏病专家对心力衰竭(HF)的管理可能优于其他医生,因为心脏病专家的治疗选择更频繁地符合已发表的指南和临床试验结果。心脏病专家对HF的管理在成本效益方面是高还是低仍有待讨论。

方法

获取了纽约州所有1995例在主要诊断位置被分配了指示HF的ICD-9-CM编码的医院出院信息。比较了心脏病专家治疗的患者与其他医生治疗的患者的人口统计学和临床特征、护理过程、资源利用情况以及短期HF相关结局。

结果

共识别出44926例患者,其中10506例(23%)接受心脏病专家的治疗,28300例(63%)接受内科医生的治疗,4812例(11%)接受家庭医生的治疗,1308例(3%)接受其他医生的治疗。心脏病专家治疗的患者更年轻,男性比例更高,住在疗养院的比例更低。他们更有可能有相关的心血管诊断,但合并一般内科疾病的可能性较小。与内科医生(3%)和家庭医生(2%)治疗的患者相比,心脏病专家治疗的患者更有可能接受心导管检查(9%),但调整后的住院时间和费用相似。各组间HF的死亡率和住院再入院率相似。“其他”组(主要由外科医生管理)的患者最年轻,接受的侵入性和心脏外科手术更多,住院时间最长,住院费用最高。

结论

心脏病专家对HF的管理在经济上并无劣势。在制定合理且基于证据的医疗人员配置建议之前,医生专业、护理过程、资源利用和临床结局之间的关系需要进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验