Powers W J, Derdeyn C P, Fritsch S M, Carpenter D A, Yundt K D, Videen T O, Grubb R L
Department of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Neurology. 2000 Feb 22;54(4):878-82. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.4.878.
To determine the prognosis of asymptomatic carotid artery occlusion.
As opposed to symptomatic carotid occlusion, little information is available on the prognosis of asymptomatic carotid occlusion.
Thirty never-symptomatic and 81 symptomatic patients with carotid occlusion underwent baseline assessment of 15 risk factors together with PET measurements of oxygen extraction fraction (OEF). Every 6-month telephone contact recorded interval medical treatment and subsequent stroke occurrence during an average follow-up of 32 months. Patients, treating physicians, and an end point adjudicator were blinded to PET results.
Ischemic stroke occurred in 1 of 30 of never-symptomatic patients (3.3%) and 15 of 81 of symptomatic patients (18.5%; p = 0.03). No strokes in the carotid territory distal to the occluded vessel occurred in the never-symptomatic patients. Multivariate analysis of baseline risk factors for all 111 patients revealed that age, plasma fibrinogen level, and PET findings of high OEF distal to the occluded carotid artery were the only independent predictors of subsequent stroke (p < 0.05). Previous ipsilateral hemispheric or retinal symptoms was not a significant predictive variable. The lower risk of stroke in never-symptomatic patients was associated with a lower incidence of high OEF (4 of 30) as opposed to symptomatic patients (39 of 81; p = 0.002), but there was no significant difference in age or fibrinogen level.
Never-symptomatic carotid occlusion carries a very low risk of subsequent ischemic stroke. This benign prognosis is associated with a low incidence of cerebral hemodynamic compromise in these patients. These data support further the importance of hemodynamic factors in the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke in patients with carotid occlusion.
确定无症状性颈动脉闭塞的预后。
与有症状的颈动脉闭塞不同,关于无症状性颈动脉闭塞的预后信息较少。
30例无症状和81例有症状的颈动脉闭塞患者接受了15项危险因素的基线评估以及氧摄取分数(OEF)的PET测量。每6个月通过电话联系记录期间的医疗治疗情况以及在平均32个月的随访期间随后发生的中风情况。患者、治疗医生和终点判定者对PET结果均不知情。
30例无症状患者中有1例发生缺血性中风(3.3%),81例有症状患者中有15例发生缺血性中风(18.5%;p = 0.03)。无症状患者中,在闭塞血管远端的颈动脉区域未发生中风。对所有111例患者的基线危险因素进行多因素分析显示,年龄、血浆纤维蛋白原水平以及闭塞颈动脉远端OEF高的PET结果是随后中风的仅有的独立预测因素(p < 0.05)。既往同侧半球或视网膜症状不是一个显著的预测变量。无症状患者中风风险较低与高OEF发生率较低相关(30例中有4例),而有症状患者为(81例中有39例;p = 0.002),但年龄或纤维蛋白原水平无显著差异。
无症状性颈动脉闭塞随后发生缺血性中风的风险非常低。这种良性预后与这些患者脑血流动力学受损发生率低有关。这些数据进一步支持了血流动力学因素在颈动脉闭塞患者缺血性中风发病机制中的重要性。