Borisenko V, Sansom M S, Woolley G A
Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 3H6, Canada.
Biophys J. 2000 Mar;78(3):1335-48. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(00)76688-4.
A dimeric alamethicin analog with lysine at position 18 in the sequence (alm-K18) was previously shown to form stable anion-selective channels in membranes at pH 7.0 [Starostin, A. V., R. Butan, V. Borisenko, D. A. James, H. Wenschuh, M. S. Sansom, and G. A. Woolley. 1999. Biochemistry. 38:6144-6150]. To probe the charge state of the conducting channel and how this might influence cation versus anion selectivity, we performed a series of single-channel selectivity measurements at different pH values. At pH 7.0 and below, only anion-selective channels were found with P(K(+))/P(Cl(-)) = 0. 25. From pH 8-10, a mixture of anion-selective, non-selective, and cation-selective channels was found. At pH > 11 only cation-selective channels were found with P(K(+))/P(Cl(-)) = 4. In contrast, native alamethicin-Q18 channels (with Gln in place of Lys at position 18) were cation-selective (P(K(+))/P(Cl(-)) = 4) at all pH values. Continuum electrostatics calculations were then carried out using an octameric model of the alm-K18 channel embedded in a low dielectric slab to simulate a membrane. Although the calculations can account for the apparent pK(a) of the channel, they fail to correctly predict the degree of selectivity. Although a switch from cation- to anion-selectivity as the channel becomes protonated is indicated, the degree of anion-selectivity is severely overestimated, suggesting that the continuum approach does not adequately represent some aspect of the electrostatics of permeation in these channels. Side-chain conformational changes upon protonation, conformational changes, and deprotonation caused by permeating cations and counterion binding by lysine residues upon protonation are considered as possible sources of the overestimation.
先前已证明,序列中第18位为赖氨酸的二聚体阿拉霉素类似物(alm-K18)在pH 7.0时可在膜中形成稳定的阴离子选择性通道[Starostin, A. V., R. Butan, V. Borisenko, D. A. James, H. Wenschuh, M. S. Sansom, and G. A. Woolley. 1999. Biochemistry. 38:6144 - 6150]。为了探究导电通道的电荷状态以及这可能如何影响阳离子与阴离子的选择性,我们在不同pH值下进行了一系列单通道选择性测量。在pH 7.0及以下,仅发现阴离子选择性通道,P(K⁺)/P(Cl⁻) = 0.25。从pH 8至10,发现了阴离子选择性、非选择性和阳离子选择性通道的混合物。在pH > 11时,仅发现阳离子选择性通道,P(K⁺)/P(Cl⁻) = 4。相比之下,天然阿拉霉素-Q18通道(第18位为谷氨酰胺而非赖氨酸)在所有pH值下均为阳离子选择性(P(K⁺)/P(Cl⁻) = 4)。然后使用嵌入低介电平板以模拟膜的alm-K18通道的八聚体模型进行连续介质静电学计算。尽管这些计算可以解释通道的表观pKa,但它们未能正确预测选择性程度。尽管表明随着通道质子化会从阳离子选择性转变为阴离子选择性,但阴离子选择性程度被严重高估,这表明连续介质方法不能充分体现这些通道中渗透静电学的某些方面。质子化时侧链构象变化、渗透阳离子引起的构象变化以及质子化时赖氨酸残基的反离子结合被认为是高估的可能来源。