Blin O, Simon N, Jouve E, Habib M, Gayraud D, Durand A, Bruguerolle B, Pisano P
Fédération de Pharmacologie Médicale et Clinique et Pharmacocinétique, CHU Timone, Marseille, France.
Clin Neuropharmacol. 2001 Mar-Apr;24(2):71-81. doi: 10.1097/00002826-200103000-00002.
This study describes for the first time the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of the psychomotor and amnesic effects of a single 2-mg oral dose of lorazepam in healthy volunteers. Twelve healthy volunteers were included in this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled two-way crossover study. The effect of lorazepam was examined for a battery of tests that explored mood, vigilance, psychomotor performance, and memory. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of these tests was performed using the indirect response model. Vigilance and psychomotor performance were significantly impaired. Short-term memory was not affected, but a paradoxical tendency to improvement of the score was observed 0.4 hours after drug intake. Significant impairment was observed for immediate and delayed cued verbal recall, for immediate and delayed free recall, and for picture recognition as well as for visual-verbal recall, but not for cued visual-spatial recall or priming. Globally, the different effects were greatest between 0.4 to 3 hours after dosing. However, the time course profile of the recovery period suggests a possible dissociation between the kinetics of the effects of lorazepam on vigilance, psychomotor performance, and visual episodic memory, on the one hand, and on verbal episodic memory, on the other. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model used two compartments with first-order absorption to describe the lorazepam concentrations and an indirect response model with inhibition or stimulation of Kin to describe the effects. The mean values for calculated median effective concentration (EC50) derived from the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of the different tests ranged from 11.3 to 39.8 ng/mL. According to these EC50 values, lorazepam seemed to be more potent on the delayed-recall trials than on the immediate-recall trials; similar observations were made concerning the free-recall versus cued-recall trials. The previously stated results suggest that the tests performed in this study represent sensitive measurements of the effects of lorazepam on the central nervous system. Moreover, the parameter values derived from pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling, especially, the EC50 values, may provide sensitive indices that can be used to compare the central nervous system effects of benzodiazepines.
本研究首次描述了健康志愿者单次口服2毫克劳拉西泮后,其对精神运动和记忆缺失作用的药代动力学和药效学模型。12名健康志愿者参与了这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的双向交叉研究。通过一系列测试来探究劳拉西泮对情绪、警觉性、精神运动表现和记忆的影响。使用间接反应模型对这些测试进行药代动力学和药效学建模。警觉性和精神运动表现受到显著损害。短期记忆未受影响,但在服药后0.4小时观察到得分有反常的改善趋势。在即时和延迟线索言语回忆、即时和延迟自由回忆、图片识别以及视觉言语回忆方面观察到显著损害,但在线索视觉空间回忆或启动方面未观察到损害。总体而言,不同效应在给药后0.4至3小时之间最为明显。然而,恢复期的时间进程表明,劳拉西泮对警觉性、精神运动表现和视觉情景记忆的影响动力学与对言语情景记忆的影响动力学之间可能存在分离。药代动力学和药效学模型使用具有一级吸收的双室模型来描述劳拉西泮浓度,并使用具有对Kin的抑制或刺激作用的间接反应模型来描述效应。从不同测试的药代动力学和药效学建模得出的计算中位有效浓度(EC50)的平均值范围为11.3至39.8纳克/毫升。根据这些EC50值,劳拉西泮在延迟回忆试验中似乎比在即时回忆试验中更有效;在自由回忆与线索回忆试验方面也有类似观察结果。上述结果表明,本研究中进行的测试代表了对劳拉西泮对中枢神经系统影响的敏感测量。此外,从药代动力学和药效学建模得出的参数值,尤其是EC50值,可能提供可用于比较苯二氮䓬类药物对中枢神经系统影响的敏感指标。