Multicentre research ethics committees: have they helped?
作者信息
Larcombe I, Mott M
机构信息
Institute of Child Health, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Bristol, UK.
出版信息
J R Soc Med. 1999 Oct;92(10):500-1. doi: 10.1177/014107689909201002.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Multicentre research ethics committees: have they helped?多中心研究伦理委员会：它们起到作用了吗？
J R Soc Med. 1999 Oct;92(10):500-1. doi: 10.1177/014107689909201002.
2
Responses of local research ethics committees to a study with approval from a multicentre research ethics committee.地方研究伦理委员会对一项经多中心研究伦理委员会批准的研究的回应。
BMJ. 2000 Apr 29;320(7243):1182-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1182.
3
The trouble with ethics committees.伦理委员会的问题。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994 Mar-Apr;28(2):102-4.
4
The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study.多中心研究伦理委员会的新审查系统：前瞻性研究。
BMJ. 2000 Apr 29;320(7243):1179-82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1179.
5
Should there be an accredited ethics committee system for centralised review of multicentre clinical research?对于多中心临床研究的集中审查，是否应该有一个经认可的伦理委员会系统？
Med J Aust. 1998 Feb 16;168(4):174-6.
6
Local research ethics committees. Report of the 2nd National Conference.地方研究伦理委员会。第二届全国会议报告。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1992 Oct;26(4):423-31.
7
The ethics of research ethics committees.研究伦理委员会的伦理学
BMJ. 2000 Apr 29;320(7243):1217.
8
Costs of seeking ethics approval before and after the introduction of multicentre research ethics committees.多中心研究伦理委员会设立前后寻求伦理批准的成本。
J R Soc Med. 2000 Oct;93(10):511-2. doi: 10.1177/014107680009301004.
9
Multicentre research ethics committees: has the cure been worse than the disease? No, but idiosyncracies and obstructions to good research must be removed.多中心研究伦理委员会：是否治丝益棼？不，但必须消除怪癖和对良好研究的阻碍。
BMJ. 2000 Apr 29;320(7243):1157-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1157.
10
Ethical ethics committees?: a response.伦理道德委员会？：一则回应。
J Med Ethics. 2000 Aug;26(4):289-90. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.4.289-a.
引用本文的文献
1
Research ethics committees in the UK--the pressure is now on research and development departments.英国的研究伦理委员会——如今研发部门面临压力。
J R Soc Med. 2005 Oct;98(10):444-7. doi: 10.1177/014107680509801007.
2
Ethical approval for research involving geographically dispersed subjects: unsuitability of the UK MREC/LREC system and relevance to uncommon genetic disorders.涉及地域分散受试者的研究的伦理批准：英国医学研究伦理委员会/地方研究伦理委员会系统的不适用性及与罕见遗传病的相关性
J Med Ethics. 2001 Oct;27(5):347-51. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.5.347.
3
Responses of local research ethics committees to a study with approval from a multicentre research ethics committee.地方研究伦理委员会对一项经多中心研究伦理委员会批准的研究的回应。
BMJ. 2000 Apr 29;320(7243):1182-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1182.
本文引用的文献
1
Research ethics committee audit: differences between committees.研究伦理委员会审计：各委员会之间的差异
J Med Ethics. 1996 Apr;22(2):78-82. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.2.78.
2
The trouble with ethics committees.伦理委员会的问题。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994 Mar-Apr;28(2):102-4.
3
Cross district comparison of applications to research ethics committees.向研究伦理委员会提交申请的跨地区比较。
BMJ. 1995 Sep 9;311(7006):660-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7006.660.
4
Local research ethics committees.当地研究伦理委员会。
BMJ. 1995 Sep 9;311(7006):639-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7006.639.
Zotero 插件