D'Imperio R L, Dubow E F, Ippolito M F
Louisiana State University Medical School, USA.
J Clin Child Psychol. 2000 Mar;29(1):129-42. doi: 10.1207/S15374424jccp2901_13.
Studied 185 seventh- and eighth-grade inner-city adolescents. Participants were categorized as low and high in exposure to stressors (stressful events or neighborhood disadvantage) and externally exhibited competence (self-, teacher, and school reports). We predicted that resilient (high-stress/high-competence) and stress-affected (high-stress/low-competence) youth would differ across three domains of hypothesized protective resources: internal resources (i.e., coping skills, perceived competence), familial support, and extrafamilial support. We also predicted that there would be an emotional cost to resilient youth in terms of experiencing internalizing problems (depression, anxiety). There were direct effects for stressor level on several protective resources; however, the hypothesized protective resources did not discriminate resilient from stress-affected youth. Both Resilient and stress-affected youth experienced equivalent levels of internalizing symptoms, and these groups' scores were higher than those of low-stress participants. These results are possibly reflective of the effects of chronic stressors.
对185名城市中心区七八年级的青少年进行了研究。参与者根据接触压力源（压力事件或邻里劣势）的程度以及外部表现出的能力（自我、教师和学校报告）分为低暴露组和高暴露组。我们预测，具有复原力的（高压力/高能力）和受压力影响的（高压力/低能力）青少年在三个假设的保护资源领域会有所不同：内部资源（即应对技能、感知能力）、家庭支持和家庭外支持。我们还预测，具有复原力的青少年在经历内化问题（抑郁、焦虑）方面会有情感代价。压力源水平对几种保护资源有直接影响；然而，假设的保护资源并没有区分具有复原力的青少年和受压力影响的青少年。具有复原力的青少年和受压力影响的青少年经历了同等程度的内化症状，并且这两组的得分都高于低压力参与者。这些结果可能反映了慢性压力源的影响。
