Fraser D M
Division of Midwifery, School of Human Development, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, UK.
Nurse Educ Today. 1999 Aug;19(6):495-501. doi: 10.1054/nedt.1999.0353.
Facilitating a unified interpretation of new or re-designed curricula can be problematic in multi-sited universities. This paper discusses the use of the Delphi technique when implementing an innovative pre-registration midwifery curriculum. It formed one of the action research cycles of the author's doctoral study and was used in an attempt to seek the views of all midwife teachers and achieve a critical mass consensus. The most important issues that emerged from the Delphi process were grouped into four categories. These four categories (the teacher's base site, communications, staff development and administration issues) formed the agenda for a staff away day. The outcome of the process was the generation of a list of priorities and actions for curriculum implementation and the identification of ways in which staff development needs might be met more effectively. An unexpected, but equally important, outcome was the way it helped with team building and agreement on positive actions for its further development.
在多校区大学中,促进对新的或重新设计的课程进行统一解读可能会出现问题。本文讨论了在实施创新型助产士预注册课程时德尔菲技术的应用。它构成了作者博士研究行动研究周期的一部分,旨在征求所有助产士教师的意见并达成关键多数共识。德尔菲过程中出现的最重要问题被归为四类。这四类问题(教师的基地、沟通、员工发展和管理问题)构成了员工外出活动日的议程。该过程的结果是生成了一份课程实施的优先事项和行动清单,并确定了更有效地满足员工发展需求的方法。一个意想不到但同样重要的结果是,它有助于团队建设以及就其进一步发展的积极行动达成一致。