Fraser D M
Academic Division of Midwifery, School of Human Development, University of Nottingham, A Floor, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Midwifery. 2000 Dec;16(4):287-94. doi: 10.1054/midw.2000.0228.
To design and implement a robust assessment scheme to more effectively identify student midwives' fitness for midwifery practice.
Five inter-related action research cycles. Methods included: documentary analysis, interviews, observation, questionnaires, focus groups.
A large university in England.
Student midwives, practising midwives and midwife teachers, childbearing women, course planning team and EME project team collaborators.
Whilst there was evidence that the majority of students are fit for midwifery practice by the end of the course, assessment schemes were found to be unreliable. In particular there was the potential for 'borderline' students to register as midwives if assessors were inadequately prepared for their responsibilities; assessment documentation was not 'user' friendly; evidence of competence was inadequately recorded or there was a lack of systematic monitoring by university teachers and examiners of the assessment in practice scheme.
The gap between curriculum aspirations and actual implementation needs to close. The assessment matrix, developed as part of the national evaluation study, could usefully be used as a framework when designing assessment schemes. The difficulties for midwife assessors in each locality need to be identified and solutions incorporated into workable but robust strategies. University midwife teachers/lectures have a responsibility to work in partnership with assessors and students to monitor assessment in practice schemes and, where local circumstances and confidence in reliability permit, grade and award credits for practice-based assessment of student capability.
设计并实施一个稳健的评估方案,以更有效地确定助产专业学生是否适合从事助产工作。
五个相互关联的行动研究周期。方法包括:文献分析、访谈、观察、问卷调查、焦点小组。
英国一所大型大学。
助产专业学生、执业助产士和助产教师、产妇、课程规划团队以及平等与多元教育(EME)项目团队合作者。
虽然有证据表明大多数学生在课程结束时适合从事助产工作,但评估方案被发现不可靠。特别是,如果评估人员对其职责准备不足,“边缘”学生有可能注册成为助产士;评估文件不“用户友好”;能力证据记录不充分,或者大学教师和考官对实践评估方案缺乏系统监测。
课程期望与实际实施之间的差距需要弥合。作为国家评估研究一部分制定的评估矩阵,在设计评估方案时可有效用作框架。需要确定每个地区助产士评估人员面临的困难,并将解决方案纳入可行但稳健的策略中。大学助产教师/讲师有责任与评估人员和学生合作,监测实践评估方案,并在当地情况和对可靠性的信心允许的情况下,对学生基于实践的能力评估进行评分和授予学分。