Mortimer M, Hjelm E W, Wiktorin C, Pernold G, Kilbom A, Vingård E
Department of Occupational Health, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Appl Ergon. 1999 Dec;30(6):477-86. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(99)00018-6.
The aim of the study was to validate interview data concerning the duration of four work postures (1) sitting, (2) standing/walking with hands above shoulder level, (3) standing/walking with hands between shoulder and knuckle level, and (4) standing/walking with hands below knuckle level. The self-reported time spent in each posture was tested in relation to observations and technical measurements in 20 subjects during two full working days. The linear relationships between self-reports and observations were strong for the three postures; sitting (r2 = 0.55), hands above shoulder level (r2 = 0.58) and hands below knuckle level (r2 = 0.69). Thus, using this interview technique, self-reports concerning time spent in (1) sitting, (2) standing/walking with hands above shoulder level and, (3) standing/walking with hands below knuckle level may be accurate enough for studying these work postures in epidemiological studies.
(1)坐姿;(2)双手举过肩部水平站立/行走;(3)双手位于肩部和指关节水平之间站立/行走;(4)双手位于指关节水平以下站立/行走。在两个完整工作日期间,对20名受试者就每种姿势的自我报告时间与观察结果和技术测量结果进行了测试。对于坐姿(r2 = 0.55)、双手举过肩部水平(r2 = 0.58)和双手位于指关节水平以下(r2 = 0.69)这三种姿势,自我报告与观察结果之间的线性关系很强。因此,使用这种访谈技术,关于(1)坐姿、(2)双手举过肩部水平站立/行走以及(3)双手位于指关节水平以下站立/行走的时间的自我报告,对于在流行病学研究中研究这些工作姿势可能足够准确。