• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

气味与气味一致的词语之间的跨模态启动效应。

Cross-modality priming between odors and odor-congruent words.

作者信息

Pauli P, Bourne L E, Diekmann H, Birbaumer N

机构信息

University of Tübingen.

出版信息

Am J Psychol. 1999 Summer;112(2):175-86.

PMID:10696274
Abstract

It is well known that the Stroop effect is subject to influence by same-modality primes, but the possibility of cross-modal priming effects is unclear. Smell is a fundamental sensory system that is assumed to have potent cross-modality priming effects. We might expect the presence of a specific odor to interfere with performance on Stroop cards containing odor-congruent words. Forty participants, half of whom were primed with an unpleasant odor and half with a pleasant odor, were examined with modified Stroop cards containing pleasant and unpleasant descriptive words. A significant Stroop card by odor group interaction was found, indicating that the presence of an odor interferes with the performance on an odor-congruent Stroop card. These findings demonstrate cross-modality priming between olfaction and vision.

摘要

众所周知,斯特鲁普效应会受到同模态启动刺激的影响,但跨模态启动效应的可能性尚不清楚。嗅觉是一种基本的感觉系统,被认为具有强大的跨模态启动效应。我们可能会预期特定气味的存在会干扰包含与气味一致单词的斯特鲁普卡片任务的表现。40名参与者,其中一半用难闻气味进行启动,另一半用愉悦气味进行启动,使用包含愉悦和不愉快描述性单词的改良斯特鲁普卡片进行测试。发现了气味组与斯特鲁普卡片之间的显著交互作用,表明气味的存在会干扰与气味一致的斯特鲁普卡片任务的表现。这些发现证明了嗅觉和视觉之间的跨模态启动效应。

相似文献

1
Cross-modality priming between odors and odor-congruent words.气味与气味一致的词语之间的跨模态启动效应。
Am J Psychol. 1999 Summer;112(2):175-86.
2
Odor intensity and color lightness are correlated sensory dimensions.气味强度和颜色亮度是相关的感官维度。
Am J Psychol. 1997 Spring;110(1):35-46.
3
Olfactory stimuli as context cues in human memory.嗅觉刺激作为人类记忆中的情境线索。
Am J Psychol. 1989 Spring;102(1):91-102.
4
Olfactory cues modulate facial attractiveness.嗅觉线索会调节面部吸引力。
Chem Senses. 2007 Jul;32(6):603-10. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjm030. Epub 2007 May 16.
5
Associations to smell are more pleasant than to sound.与气味的联想比与声音的联想更令人愉悦。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001 Aug;23(4):484-9. doi: 10.1076/jcen.23.4.484.1236.
6
Cross-modal interactions between olfaction and vision when grasping.抓握时嗅觉与视觉之间的跨模态交互作用。
Chem Senses. 2006 Sep;31(7):665-71. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjl007. Epub 2006 Jun 22.
7
Performance in auditory and visual emotional stroop tasks: a comparison of older and younger adults.听觉和视觉情绪斯特鲁普任务中的表现:老年人与年轻人的比较。
Psychol Aging. 2004 Sep;19(3):523-35. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.3.523.
8
Negative priming effects in children engaged in nonspatial tasks: evidence for early development of an intact inhibitory mechanism.参与非空间任务的儿童中的负启动效应:完整抑制机制早期发展的证据。
Dev Psychol. 2004 Mar;40(2):191-203. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.191.
9
Odors as cues for the recall of words unrelated to odor.气味作为回忆与气味无关单词的线索。
Percept Mot Skills. 1996 Dec;83(3 Pt 2):1227-34. doi: 10.2466/pms.1996.83.3f.1227.
10
Affective priming as an indirect measure of food preferences acquired through odor conditioning.情感启动作为通过气味条件作用获得的食物偏好的一种间接测量方法。
Exp Psychol. 2005;52(3):180-6. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.3.180.

引用本文的文献

1
A cognitive nose? Evaluating working memory benchmarks in the olfactory domain.有认知功能的鼻子?评估嗅觉领域的工作记忆基准。
Chem Senses. 2025 Jan 22;50. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaf008.
2
Event-Related Brain Potentials Associated With the Olfactory-Visual Stroop Effect and Its Modulation by Olfactory-Induced Emotional States.与嗅觉-视觉斯特鲁普效应及其由嗅觉诱发的情绪状态调节相关的事件相关脑电位。
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 9;11:583. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00583. eCollection 2020.
3
Odor alters color preference in a foraging jumping spider.
气味会改变觅食中的跳蛛对颜色的偏好。
Behav Ecol. 2018 Jul-Aug;29(4):833-839. doi: 10.1093/beheco/ary068. Epub 2018 May 23.