Filliol I, Sola C, Rastogi N
Unité de la Tuberculose et des Mycobactéries, Institut Pasteur, F-97165 Pointe à Pitre Cedex, Guadeloupe.
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Mar;38(3):1231-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.3.1231-1234.2000.
Spoligotyping, a method based on the variability of distribution of the 43 inter-direct repeat (DR) spacers of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis BCG, is useful to study the molecular epidemiology of bovine and human tuberculosis. Recently, a major family of M. tuberculosis clinical isolates named the Haarlem family, which did not contain spacers 31 and 33 to 36, was reported in a multicenter study. Independently, a data bank containing all the published spoligotypes showed that the two most prevalent spoligotypes in the world differed only by the presence or absence of spacer 31. A careful analysis of the DR locus sequence led us to hypothesize that spacer 31 may not have been amplified in some isolates with the primer sets DRa and DRb currently used for spoligotyping. Consequently, a modified spoligotyping method based on different combinations of the 36-bp DR and IS6110 primers was devised that was able to discriminate between the left and the right parts of the DR locus and demonstrated the presence of the previously unamplified spacer 31 for some of the clinical isolates. By analogy, we suggest that a single-spacer difference in some epidemiologically linked cases of tuberculosis may simply arise due to the insertion of an extra copy of IS6110 within the DR locus, leading to its asymmetrical disruption and subsequent lack of the DRa or DRb targets. The influence of the IS6110 preferential insertion sites within the DR locus on spoligotyping results should be further investigated.
间隔寡核苷酸分型(Spoligotyping)是一种基于结核分枝杆菌和卡介苗的43个间隔区重复(DR)序列分布变异性的方法,可用于研究牛和人结核病的分子流行病学。最近,在一项多中心研究中报道了一个主要的结核分枝杆菌临床分离株家族,即哈勒姆家族,该家族不包含间隔区31以及间隔区33至36。独立地,一个包含所有已发表间隔寡核苷酸分型结果的数据库显示,世界上两种最常见的间隔寡核苷酸分型仅在间隔区31的有无上存在差异。对DR基因座序列的仔细分析使我们推测,在目前用于间隔寡核苷酸分型的引物对DRa和DRb的作用下,间隔区31可能在某些分离株中未被扩增。因此,设计了一种基于36bp DR引物和IS6110引物不同组合的改良间隔寡核苷酸分型方法,该方法能够区分DR基因座的左右部分,并证明了一些临床分离株中存在先前未扩增的间隔区31。以此类推,我们认为在一些有流行病学关联的结核病病例中,单个间隔区的差异可能仅仅是由于DR基因座内额外插入了一个IS6110拷贝,导致其不对称破坏以及随后缺乏DRa或DRb靶点。DR基因座内IS6110优先插入位点对间隔寡核苷酸分型结果的影响应进一步研究。