Jacobson E, Forssblad M, Rosenberg J, Westman L, Weidenhielm L
Artro Clinic, S:t Görans Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Arthroscopy. 2000 Mar;16(2):183-90. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(00)90034-3.
Local anesthesia (LA) for outpatient knee arthroscopy is not a standard procedure at most hospitals. To evaluate the LA technique for knee arthroscopy on medically healthy patients, this study compared 3 anesthesia techniques. Four hundred patients were randomized to either local (n = 200), general (n = 100), or spinal (n = 100) anesthesia. Evaluated outcomes included the patient's subjective view of the procedure, and nausea and pain at rest and during active movement. All variables were recorded perioperatively and postoperatively. In addition, the performing surgeon's opinion of the degree of patient pain and the technical difficulty of the procedure were noted. Three hundred forty-two patients completed the study. In the group receiving local anesthesia (n = 180) the median visual analog scale pain score during surgery was 6 mm (mean, 17.5; SD, 23.2; range, 0 to 100 mm). Twenty-one LA patients would have preferred another form of anesthesia. In 29 patients, LA was not considered as the optimal anesthesia by the performing surgeon. Eight LA patients agreed with the surgeon that the anesthesia method used was not optimal, of these patients, 5 had synovitis (3%). In 5% of the LA patients there were technical problems. Thus, this study shows that elective knee arthroscopy can be performed under local anesthesia in 92% of the patients from a technical point of view. Excluding patients who do not choose local anesthesia and those who have hypertrophic synovitis preoperatively, knee arthroscopies can be performed as safely and effectively under local anesthesia as under any other form of anesthesia. For most patients, local anesthesia can be recommended as the standard procedure for outpatient knee arthroscopy.
在大多数医院,门诊膝关节镜检查采用局部麻醉并非标准操作流程。为评估在身体健康的患者中膝关节镜检查的局部麻醉技术,本研究比较了三种麻醉技术。400例患者被随机分为局部麻醉组(n = 200)、全身麻醉组(n = 100)或脊髓麻醉组(n = 100)。评估的结果包括患者对手术的主观感受,以及静息和主动活动时的恶心和疼痛情况。所有变量均在围手术期和术后进行记录。此外,还记录了主刀医生对患者疼痛程度和手术技术难度的看法。342例患者完成了研究。在接受局部麻醉的组(n = 180)中,手术期间视觉模拟评分法疼痛评分的中位数为6 mm(均值为17.5;标准差为23.2;范围为0至100 mm)。21例接受局部麻醉的患者希望采用其他形式的麻醉。在29例患者中,主刀医生认为局部麻醉并非最佳麻醉方式。8例接受局部麻醉的患者同意医生的观点,即所用麻醉方法并非最佳,其中5例患有滑膜炎(3%)。5%接受局部麻醉的患者存在技术问题。因此,本研究表明,从技术角度来看,92%的患者可以在局部麻醉下进行择期膝关节镜检查。排除术前不选择局部麻醉的患者以及患有肥厚性滑膜炎的患者,膝关节镜检查在局部麻醉下与在任何其他形式的麻醉下一样安全有效。对于大多数患者,可推荐局部麻醉作为门诊膝关节镜检查的标准操作流程。