Matsukawa T, Ozaki M, Nishiyama T, Imamura M, Kumazawa T
Department of Anesthesia, Yamanashi Medical University, Japan.
Crit Care Med. 2000 Feb;28(2):532-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200002000-00041.
To test the hypothesis that the infrared thermometer (Genius) is comparably useful with thermocouples that are routinely used for skin temperature monitoring.
Prospective, controlled, not blinded study.
Operating room of a university hospital.
Ten healthy male volunteers.
Volunteers were minimally clothed and were initially warmed by a forced air warmer until they became vasodilated at the finger and the foot for approximately 30 mins. Subsequently, they were kept in the room with no blanket.
Skin temperatures were measured continuously with the Mon-a-Therm thermocouple and were also measured with the Genius thermometer just before and after the warming and subsequently every 10 mins for 70 mins. Forearm and finger-tip skin temperatures and skin-surface temperature gradients (from arm to finger and from calf to toe) measured by the Genius thermometer were compared with those measured by the Mon-a-Therm thermocouple using linear regression and Bland and Altman statistics. Forearm temperature and finger-tip temperature ranged from approximately 31 degrees to approximately 36.5 degrees C (87.8-97.7 degrees F) and approximately 22.5 degrees to approximately 36 degrees C (72.5-96.8 degrees F), respectively. Gradients (from arm to finger and from calf to toe) ranged from approximately -3 degrees to approximately 10 degrees C (26.6-50.0 degrees F) and approximately -3 degrees to approximately 11 degrees C (26.6-51.8 degrees F), respectively. Correlations between the temperatures measured by the Genius thermometer and those by the Mon-a-Therm thermocouple were similar and reliable. The correlation coefficients were as follows: 0.78 at forearm, 0.97 at finger-tip, and 0.97 at skin-surface temperature gradients.
The infrared thermometer with a special probe is useful to measure the change of skin-surface temperatures and to evaluate the severity of shock in patients.
检验红外体温计(Genius)与常规用于皮肤温度监测的热电偶具有同等效用这一假设。
前瞻性、对照、非盲法研究。
一所大学医院的手术室。
10名健康男性志愿者。
志愿者穿着极少的衣物,最初使用强制空气暖风机进行保暖,直至手指和足部血管扩张约30分钟。随后,他们被安置在没有毯子的房间里。
使用Mon-a-Therm热电偶持续测量皮肤温度,在保暖前后以及随后的70分钟内每隔10分钟使用Genius体温计进行测量。使用线性回归以及布兰德-奥特曼统计方法,将Genius体温计测量的前臂和指尖皮肤温度以及皮肤表面温度梯度(从手臂到手指以及从小腿到脚趾)与Mon-a-Therm热电偶测量的结果进行比较。前臂温度和指尖温度分别在约31摄氏度至约36.5摄氏度(87.8 - 97.7华氏度)和约22.5摄氏度至约36摄氏度(72.5 - 96.8华氏度)之间。温度梯度(从手臂到手指以及从小腿到脚趾)分别在约 - 3摄氏度至约10摄氏度(26.6 - 50.0华氏度)和约 - 3摄氏度至约11摄氏度(26.6 - 51.8华氏度)之间。Genius体温计与Mon-a-Therm热电偶测量的温度之间的相关性相似且可靠。相关系数如下:前臂为0.78,指尖为0.97,皮肤表面温度梯度为0.97。
带有特殊探头的红外体温计可用于测量皮肤表面温度变化并评估患者休克的严重程度。