Chia K H, Ong H S, Teoh M K, Lim T T, Tan S G
Department of General Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Singapore Med J. 1999 Nov;40(11):685-90.
BACKGROUND/AIM OF STUDY: End-stage renal failure (ESRF) patients requiring long-term haemodialysis need a durable vascular access. The arterio-venous fistula (AVF) with its long patency rate and low complication profile is usually the first choice procedure for vascular access creation. However when superficial veins are not suitable for AVF creation or have all been exhausted as a result of repeated AVF procedures, arterio-venous grafts (AVG) using polytetraflouroethylene (PTFE) to bridge arteries and veins is an alternative for provision of continued vascular access for haemodialysis. This study is a review of our experience in using PTFE AVGs for vascular access in patients requiring chronic haemodialysis.
A retrospective review was done on 92 grafts in 77 patients placed by 3 vascular access surgeons at the Singapore General Hospital from January 1989 to December 1994.
There were 58 female and 19 male patients with a median age of 43 years (range 15-76 years). Twelve patients (16%) were diabetic and 6 patients (8%) had systemic lupus erythematosis requiring long-term steroids. Seventy-three percent of patients had up to 2 previous AVF creations before placement of AVG over the forearm (64%), upper arm (23%) or thigh (6.5%). Complications include graft infection (19), pseudoaneurysm formation (10), graft thrombosis (24), steal syndrome (1), venous congestion (1) and venous end stenosis (1). Diabetic status and long-term steroid therapy did not significantly increase the incidence of graft infection. The patency rates at 24 months and 36 months were 77% and 58% respectively. However serviceability rates were 61% at 2 years and 38% at 3 years mainly due to infective complications.
PTFE AVGs offer reasonable patency and serviceability rates as a vascular access modality but in view of their complication profile, the native vein arteriovenous fistula should continue to be the first choice procedure for vascular access in patients requiring chronic haemodialysis.
研究背景/目的:需要长期血液透析的终末期肾衰竭(ESRF)患者需要一种持久的血管通路。动静脉内瘘(AVF)因其长期通畅率和低并发症发生率,通常是建立血管通路的首选方法。然而,当浅表静脉不适合建立AVF或由于反复进行AVF手术而全部用尽时,使用聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)桥接动脉和静脉的动静脉移植物(AVG)是为血液透析提供持续血管通路的一种替代方法。本研究回顾了我们使用PTFE AVG为需要慢性血液透析的患者建立血管通路的经验。
对1989年1月至1994年12月期间新加坡总医院3位血管通路外科医生为77例患者植入的92条移植物进行回顾性研究。
患者中女性58例,男性19例,中位年龄43岁(范围15 - 76岁)。12例患者(16%)患有糖尿病,6例患者(8%)患有系统性红斑狼疮,需要长期使用类固醇。73%的患者在在前臂(64%)、上臂(23%)或大腿(6.5%)植入AVG之前,曾进行过多达2次的AVF手术。并发症包括移植物感染(19例)、假性动脉瘤形成(10例)、移植物血栓形成(24例)、窃血综合征(1例)、静脉充血(1例)和静脉端狭窄(1例)。糖尿病状态和长期类固醇治疗并未显著增加移植物感染的发生率。24个月和36个月时的通畅率分别为77%和58%。然而,由于感染性并发症,2年时的可用率为61%,3年时为38%。
PTFE AVG作为一种血管通路方式,具有合理的通畅率和可用率,但鉴于其并发症情况,自体静脉动静脉内瘘仍应是需要慢性血液透析的患者建立血管通路的首选方法。