Picada R, Winter R B, Lonstein J E, Denis F, Pinto M R, Smith M D, Perra J H
Twin Cities Spine Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404, USA.
J Spinal Disord. 2000 Feb;13(1):42-5. doi: 10.1097/00002517-200002000-00009.
The authors reviewed 817 instrumented lumbosacral fusions in adults and found an incidence of 3.2% deep wound infections. The primary focus of this study was the management of these infections, with particular attention to whether the implants needed to be removed. A consulting infectious disease specialist indicated that an acute infection of a low back fusion wound could not be healed without removal of the metallic implants. This opinion was in contrast to the authors' daily experience and prompted this study. The authors identified and reviewed 817 cases of instrumented posterior lumbosacral arthrodeses in adults. A detailed analysis of any case with a deep wound infection was performed and yielded and infection rate of 3.2% (26 patients). Of these, 24 achieved a clean, closed wound without removal of instrumentation through a protocol of aggressive debridement and secondary closure. Instrumentation removal is not necessary to obtain a clean, closed wound using an aggressive approach with early diagnosis, vigorous debridement in the operative room under general anesthesia, delayed primary or secondary closure, and appropriate antibiotic coverage.
作者回顾了817例成人腰骶部器械辅助融合手术,发现深部伤口感染发生率为3.2%。本研究的主要重点是这些感染的处理,尤其关注植入物是否需要取出。一位感染病咨询专家表示,腰骶部融合伤口的急性感染若不取出金属植入物则无法愈合。这一观点与作者的日常经验相悖,从而促成了本研究。作者识别并回顾了817例成人腰骶部后路器械辅助关节融合术病例。对任何深部伤口感染病例进行了详细分析,得出感染率为3.2%(26例患者)。其中,24例通过积极清创和二期缝合的方案,在未取出器械的情况下实现了伤口清洁闭合。采用早期诊断、全身麻醉下在手术室进行积极清创、延迟一期或二期缝合以及适当抗生素覆盖的积极方法,无需取出器械即可获得清洁闭合的伤口。