Suppr超能文献

椎间融合器后路腰椎椎间融合术后深部伤口感染的处理

Management of deep wound infection after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages.

作者信息

Mirovsky Yigal, Floman Yizhar, Smorgick Yossi, Ashkenazi Ely, Anekstein Yoram, Millgram Michael A, Giladi Michael

机构信息

Spine Unit, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.

出版信息

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Apr;20(2):127-31. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211266.66615.e5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate long-term treatment outcome of patients with infected posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) managed with surgical debridement and or prolonged antiobiotic treatment without removal of the interbody cages.

METHODS

Between 1996 and 1999, 8 out of 111 patients who underwent PLIF were diagnosed with deep wound infection (7.2%). All infected patients were clinically followed for at least 2 years after completion of the antibiotic treatment. Longer follow-up of at least 6 years duration was performed by a telephone interview.

RESULTS

Six patients were managed with surgical debridement, wound irrigation, and primary closure of the wound. None of the patients required removal of the instrumentation. In 2 patients, the PLIF cages were repositioned in the face of infection. All 8 patients received 4 to 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotic therapy followed by another 6 to 9 weeks of oral antibiotic administration. At 2-year follow-up, no clinical or laboratory signs of recurrent infection were evident. Four of the 8 patients reported improved clinical status compared with their prefusion status. At 6-year follow-up, 3 patients had minimal disability according to the Oswestry Disability Index and 2 patients had moderate disability with residual leg pain.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases of postoperative deep wound infection after PLIF with cages, removal of the interbody implants is not necessary. Treatment is composed of prolonged antibiotic therapy guided by antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolated bacteria and supplemented with extensive surgical debridement if needed.

摘要

目的

评估接受手术清创和/或延长抗生素治疗且未取出椎间融合器的感染性腰椎后路椎间融合术(PLIF)患者的长期治疗效果。

方法

1996年至1999年期间,111例行PLIF手术的患者中有8例被诊断为深部伤口感染(7.2%)。所有感染患者在抗生素治疗结束后均接受了至少2年的临床随访。通过电话访谈进行了至少6年的更长时间随访。

结果

6例患者接受了手术清创、伤口冲洗和伤口一期缝合。所有患者均无需取出内固定器械。2例患者在感染情况下重新调整了PLIF融合器的位置。所有8例患者均接受了4至6周的静脉抗生素治疗,随后又接受了6至9周的口服抗生素治疗。在2年随访时,没有复发性感染的临床或实验室迹象。8例患者中有4例报告其临床状况较融合术前有所改善。在6年随访时,根据奥斯威斯利残疾指数,3例患者残疾程度轻微,2例患者有中度残疾且残留腿部疼痛。

结论

在使用融合器的PLIF术后深部伤口感染的病例中,无需取出椎间植入物。治疗包括根据分离细菌的药敏结果进行延长的抗生素治疗,并在需要时辅以广泛的手术清创。

相似文献

1
Management of deep wound infection after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Apr;20(2):127-31. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211266.66615.e5.
4
Clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion complicated by deep wound infection: a case-control study.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jul 15;37(16):1370-4. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824a4d93.
7
Implant removal for the management of infection after instrumented spinal fusion.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Jun;23(4):258-65. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181a9452c.

引用本文的文献

1
4
Treatment strategy for surgical site infection post posterior lumbar interbody fusion: A retrospective study.
J Orthop. 2022 Mar 18;31:40-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.03.004. eCollection 2022 May-Jun.
5
Postoperative Spinal Implant Infections (PSII)-A Systematic Review: What Do We Know So Far and What is Critical About It?
Global Spine J. 2022 Jul;12(6):1231-1246. doi: 10.1177/21925682211024198. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
8
Surgical revision strategies for postoperative spinal implant infections (PSII).
J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;6(4):777-784. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-514.
10
Gas forming infection of the spine: a systematic and narrative review.
Eur Spine J. 2021 Jun;30(6):1708-1720. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06646-7. Epub 2020 Oct 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验