Schlemper R J, Kato Y, Stolte M
Department of Internal Medicine, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Japan.
Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol. 1999;83:62-70.
Gastric neoplastic lesions labelled as high-grade adenoma/dysplasia by Western pathologists are often diagnosed as mucosal carcinoma by Japanese pathologists. We examined whether stratifying histological diagnoses by invasion status could increase the extent of agreement between Western and Japanese pathologists and could reduce the frequency of discrepant diagnoses between biopsy samples and corresponding resected specimens.
Thirty-five histological slides of gastric lesions that had previously been individually reviewed by eight expert gastrointestinal pathologists from Japan, North America and Europe were reassessed by the same pathologists with particular attention to the aspect of invasion. Kappa statistics were used to determine the extent of agreement between Western and Japanese pathologists before and after reclassifying the diagnoses according to invasion status. Moreover, we examined the number of discrepant assessments regarding 14 lesions of which there were both biopsy specimens and resected specimens.
There was agreement between the Western and Japanese pathologists in only 11 (31%) of the 35 slides (kappa coefficient 0.15) when traditional diagnostic categories were used. However, after high-grade adenoma/dysplasia, noninvasive carcinoma and suspected carcinoma were grouped together, there was better agreement, namely in 22 (63%) of the slides (kappa coefficient 0.41). Moreover, such reclassification significantly reduced the number of discrepant diagnoses between biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimens by three Western pathologists, from 19 (45%) of 42 assessments when high-grade adenoma/dysplasia was grouped together with low-grade adenoma/dysplasia, to 6 (14%) of 42 assessments when grouped with suspected and definite carcinoma.
To improve the international comparability of gastric histological diagnoses we recommend that high-grade adenoma/dysplasia, noninvasive carcinoma and suspicion of invasive carcinoma be grouped together as a single category of noninvasive high-grade epithelial neoplasia.
被西方病理学家标记为高级别腺瘤/发育异常的胃肿瘤性病变,日本病理学家常常诊断为黏膜癌。我们研究了根据浸润状态对组织学诊断进行分层是否能提高西方和日本病理学家之间的一致性程度,并能否减少活检样本与相应切除标本之间的诊断差异频率。
35张胃病变组织学切片,此前已由来自日本、北美和欧洲的8位胃肠病病理专家分别进行过评估,现由同一批病理学家重新评估,特别关注浸润方面。在根据浸润状态对诊断进行重新分类前后,使用kappa统计量来确定西方和日本病理学家之间的一致程度。此外,我们检查了14例同时有活检标本和切除标本的病变的差异评估数量。
使用传统诊断类别时,35张切片中只有11张(31%)西方和日本病理学家的诊断一致(kappa系数0.15)。然而,将高级别腺瘤/发育异常、非浸润性癌和疑似癌归为一组后,一致性更好,即22张切片(63%)诊断一致(kappa系数0.41)。此外,这种重新分类显著减少了3位西方病理学家对活检和内镜黏膜切除标本的诊断差异数量,从高级别腺瘤/发育异常与低级别腺瘤/发育异常归为一组时42次评估中的19次(45%),降至与疑似癌和确诊癌归为一组时42次评估中的6次(14%)。
为提高胃组织学诊断的国际可比性,我们建议将高级别腺瘤/发育异常、非浸润性癌和疑似浸润性癌归为非浸润性高级别上皮性肿瘤这一单一类别。