Wuest J
Wayne State University, USA.
Qual Health Res. 2000 Jan;10(1):51-70. doi: 10.1177/104973200129118246.
A strength of substantive grounded theories is that they are modifiable. Yet, little attention is given in the research literature to the evolution of grounded theories through the process of emergent fit. In this article, emergent fit is discussed, and the evolution of the theoretical understanding of relationships with helping systems is provided as an example. In a feminist grounded-theory study of women's caring, emergent fit with existing inductive research on health care relationships resulted in a framework of negotiating, which includes four strategies: reframing responsibility, becoming an expert, harnessing resources, and taking on more. This explanatory model demonstrates how the use of emergent fit can avoid the generation of isolated theories and contribute to knowledge accumulation by producing a substantive theory with wider applicability.
实质性扎根理论的一个优点是它们具有可修改性。然而,研究文献中很少关注扎根理论通过涌现契合过程的演变。本文讨论了涌现契合,并以与帮助系统关系的理论理解的演变为例进行说明。在一项关于女性关怀的女性主义扎根理论研究中,与现有的关于医疗保健关系的归纳研究的涌现契合产生了一个协商框架,其中包括四种策略:重新界定责任、成为专家、利用资源和承担更多责任。这个解释模型展示了涌现契合的运用如何能够避免孤立理论的产生,并通过产生一个具有更广泛适用性的实质性理论来促进知识积累。