Díaz F J, Vega J A, Patiño P J, Bedoya G, Nagles J, Villegas C, Vesga R, Rugeles M T
Laboratorio de Virología, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2000 Mar-Apr;95(2):237-42. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762000000200018.
Repeated exposure to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) does not always result in seroconversion. Modifications in coreceptors for HIV entrance to target cells are one of the factors that block the infection. We studied the frequency of Delta-32 mutation in ccr5 gene in Medellin, Colombia. Two hundred and eighteen individuals distributed in three different groups were analyzed for Delta-32 mutation in ccr5 gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR): 29 HIV seropositive (SP), 39 exposed seronegative (ESN) and 150 individuals as a general population sample (GPS). The frequency of the Delta-32 mutant allele was 3.8% for ESN, 2.7% for GPS and 1.7% for SP. Only one homozygous mutant genotype (Delta-32/Delta-32) was found among the ESN (2.6%). The heterozygous genotype (ccr5/Delta-32) was found in eight GPS (5.3%), in one SP (3.4%) and in one ESN (2.6%). The differences in the allelic and genotypic frequencies among the three groups were not statistically significant. A comparison between the expected and the observed genotypic frequencies showed that these frequencies were significantly different for the ESN group, which indirectly suggests a protective effect of the mutant genotype (Delta-32/Delta-32). Since this mutant genotype explained the resistance of infection in only one of our ESN persons, different mechanisms of protection must be playing a more important role in this population.
反复接触人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)并不总会导致血清转化。HIV进入靶细胞的共受体发生改变是阻止感染的因素之一。我们研究了哥伦比亚麦德林市ccr5基因中Delta-32突变的频率。通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)分析了分布在三个不同组的218名个体的ccr5基因中的Delta-32突变:29名HIV血清阳性(SP)者、39名暴露后血清阴性(ESN)者和150名作为普通人群样本(GPS)的个体。ESN组中Delta-32突变等位基因的频率为3.8%,GPS组为2.7%,SP组为1.7%。在ESN组中仅发现1例纯合突变基因型(Delta-32/Delta-32)(2.6%)。杂合基因型(ccr5/Delta-32)在8名GPS个体(5.3%)、1名SP个体(3.4%)和1名ESN个体(2.6%)中被发现。三组之间等位基因和基因型频率的差异无统计学意义。预期基因型频率与观察到的基因型频率之间的比较表明,ESN组的这些频率存在显著差异,这间接提示了突变基因型(Delta-32/Delta-32)的保护作用。由于这种突变基因型仅解释了我们的1例ESN个体的感染抗性,不同的保护机制在该人群中必定发挥着更重要的作用。