Fibreoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of lung cancer.

A total of 562 patients with lung cancer was evaluated by fibreoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) by three bronchoscopic diagnostic procedures: biopsy, bronchial brushing and bronchial washing. Endoscopically visible tumours (EV) were detected in 264, while 257 had endoscopically nonvisible tumours > or = 2 cm in diameter and FOB was done without fluoroscopy because of limited availability (ENV). Forty-one had small (< 2 cm), endoscopically nonvisible tumours with FOB performed under uniplanar fluoroscopy (ENV + F). The overall diagnostic yield rates of FOB were 98.1%, 61.5% and 58.5% for the EV, ENV and ENV + F cases, respectively. Reviewing the differential yield rates of the three diagnostic techniques and comparing them with the results of previous studies led to the following conclusions. (1) Combinations of biopsy with brushing and biopsy with washing can diagnose more than 95% of all fibreoptic bronchoscopy positive cases with endoscopically visible tumours. Performing either of these combinations may be more cost-effective than doing all three techniques routinely. (2) For cases with endoscopically nonvisible tumours, performance of all three diagnostic techniques is recommended, especially when fibreoptic bronchoscopy is performed without fluoroscopic guidance, as washing and brushing seem to compensate for a lower yield of the biopsy. (3) For tumours < 2 cm in diameter, knowledge on the diagnostic efficacy of fibreoptic bronchoscopy was limited owing to the small size of previous studies. The yield of 58.5% for fibreoptic bronchoscopy in these patients with performance of all three diagnostic procedures was comparatively high. It could be further increased to 75.6% if supplemented by percutaneous needle biopsy when fibreoptic bronchoscopy turned out to be nondiagnostic. If available, the use of transbronchial needle aspiration may also increase the overall diagnostic yield of fibreoptic bronchoscopy in these cases.