Suppr超能文献

支气管肺泡灌洗液液基细胞学与支气管刷检标本联合在肺癌诊断中的应用。

The usefulness of liquid-based cytology of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid combined with bronchial brush specimens in lung cancer diagnosis.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, P. R. China.

Ningbo University School of Medicine, Ningbo, Zhejiang, P. R. China.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2022 Nov;50(11):3000605221132708. doi: 10.1177/03000605221132708.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the diagnostic value of liquid-based cytology (LBC) of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) combined with bronchial brushing (BB).

METHODS

One hundred patients with pulmonary masses or nodules found by chest computed tomography (CT) or X-ray before bronchoscopy or other diagnostic biopsy examinations were selected consecutively for this retrospective study. BALF and BB were performed for all patients. After conventional smear via BB, we mixed the BALF and BB samples in a prepared thin-layer bottle.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of LBC of BALF combined with BB was noticeably higher than that of BB alone in the total sample group (65.15% vs. 32.84%, respectively). Similarly, in both the bronchoscopically visible group and invisible group, a higher sensitivity for LBC of BALF with BB vs BB alone (68.89% vs. 39.13%, respectively; 57.14% vs. 19.05%, respectively) was observed. Additionally, the negative predictive value of LBC of BALF with BB was higher than that with BB alone (58.56% vs. 42.31%; 61.29% vs. 44.73%; 53.47% vs. 37.83%; total sample vs visible vs invisible groups, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Regardless of whether lesions or nodules are bronchoscopically visible or invisible, LBC of BALF combined with BB may increase the diagnostic value over BB alone in lung cancer diagnosis.

摘要

目的

探讨支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)液基细胞学(LBC)联合支气管刷检(BB)的诊断价值。

方法

本回顾性研究连续选取 100 例经胸部 CT 或 X 线检查发现肺部肿块或结节的患者,所有患者均行 BALF 和 BB 检查。BB 常规涂片后,将 BALF 和 BB 样本混合在准备好的薄层瓶中。

结果

在总样本组中,BALF 联合 BB 的 LBC 敏感性明显高于 BB 单独检查(65.15% vs. 32.84%)。同样,在可支气管镜下可见和不可见组中,BALF 联合 BB 的 LBC 敏感性也明显高于 BB 单独检查(68.89% vs. 39.13%;57.14% vs. 19.05%)。此外,BALF 联合 BB 的 LBC 阴性预测值高于 BB 单独检查(58.56% vs. 42.31%;61.29% vs. 44.73%;53.47% vs. 37.83%;总样本组、可见组、不可见组)。

结论

无论病变或结节是否在支气管镜下可见,BALF 联合 BB 的 LBC 检查可能会提高肺癌诊断的价值。

相似文献

3
[Application of DNA-image cytometry in the diagnosis of lung cancer].[DNA图像细胞术在肺癌诊断中的应用]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2016 Feb;38(2):113-7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2016.02.007.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验