Trangerud Hanne Amanda
Department of Culture Studies and Oriental Languages, Faculty of Humanities, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1010 Blindern, 0315 Oslo, Norway.
Vaccine X. 2023 Jul 7;14:100349. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100349. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Research has identified religion as one of numerous factors that may contribute to delay or refusal of vaccination. The influence of religion on vaccine decisions may be accidental, or it may involve explicit religious objections. By presenting a typology of religious vaccine skepticism, this article seeks to give a comprehensive overview of the essence of these objections and to clarify differences and similarities between them. This knowledge is useful for policy-makers and others who wish to better understand the influence of religion on vaccine decision-making. The typology consists of five main types: (1) a worldview clash type, in which vaccines do not make sense as a health intervention; (2) a divine will type, which represents a form of passive fatalism; (3) an immorality type, which considers some vaccines unethical because of their production or effect; (4) an impurity type, pointing to ingredients that will defile the body; and (5) a conspiracy type, in which a vaccine plot is targeting a religious group.
研究已确定宗教是可能导致延迟接种或拒绝接种疫苗的众多因素之一。宗教对疫苗决策的影响可能是偶然的,也可能涉及明确的宗教反对意见。通过呈现宗教疫苗怀疑论的类型学,本文旨在全面概述这些反对意见的本质,并阐明它们之间的异同。这些知识对于希望更好地理解宗教对疫苗决策影响的政策制定者和其他人来说是有用的。该类型学主要包括五种类型:(1)世界观冲突型,即疫苗作为一种健康干预措施毫无意义;(2)神圣意志型,这代表了一种被动宿命论的形式;(3)不道德型,认为某些疫苗因其生产或效果而不道德;(4)不纯型,指出会玷污身体的成分;(5)阴谋型,即疫苗阴谋针对某个宗教团体。