Suppr超能文献

“疫苗有什么问题?”宗教性疫苗怀疑论的一种类型学分析

"What is the problem with vaccines?" A typology of religious vaccine skepticism.

作者信息

Trangerud Hanne Amanda

机构信息

Department of Culture Studies and Oriental Languages, Faculty of Humanities, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1010 Blindern, 0315 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Vaccine X. 2023 Jul 7;14:100349. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100349. eCollection 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Research has identified religion as one of numerous factors that may contribute to delay or refusal of vaccination. The influence of religion on vaccine decisions may be accidental, or it may involve explicit religious objections. By presenting a typology of religious vaccine skepticism, this article seeks to give a comprehensive overview of the essence of these objections and to clarify differences and similarities between them. This knowledge is useful for policy-makers and others who wish to better understand the influence of religion on vaccine decision-making. The typology consists of five main types: (1) a worldview clash type, in which vaccines do not make sense as a health intervention; (2) a divine will type, which represents a form of passive fatalism; (3) an immorality type, which considers some vaccines unethical because of their production or effect; (4) an impurity type, pointing to ingredients that will defile the body; and (5) a conspiracy type, in which a vaccine plot is targeting a religious group.

摘要

研究已确定宗教是可能导致延迟接种或拒绝接种疫苗的众多因素之一。宗教对疫苗决策的影响可能是偶然的,也可能涉及明确的宗教反对意见。通过呈现宗教疫苗怀疑论的类型学,本文旨在全面概述这些反对意见的本质,并阐明它们之间的异同。这些知识对于希望更好地理解宗教对疫苗决策影响的政策制定者和其他人来说是有用的。该类型学主要包括五种类型:(1)世界观冲突型,即疫苗作为一种健康干预措施毫无意义;(2)神圣意志型,这代表了一种被动宿命论的形式;(3)不道德型,认为某些疫苗因其生产或效果而不道德;(4)不纯型,指出会玷污身体的成分;(5)阴谋型,即疫苗阴谋针对某个宗教团体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a00a/10362305/ed85c8f656d0/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验