Suppr超能文献

聚乙烯醇固定剂与三种危害较小的固定剂在肠道寄生虫检测与鉴定中的比较

Comparison of polyvinyl alcohol fixative with three less hazardous fixatives for detection and identification of intestinal parasites.

作者信息

Jensen B, Kepley W, Guarner J, Anderson K, Anderson D, Clairmont J, De L'aune W, Austin E H, Austin G E

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, GA 30033, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Apr;38(4):1592-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.4.1592-1598.2000.

Abstract

Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) containing the fixative mercuric chloride is considered the "gold standard" for the fixation of ova and parasites in the preparation of permanently stained smears of stool specimens. However, mercuric chloride is potentially hazardous to laboratory personnel and presents disposal problems. We compared three new alternative, nontoxic fixatives with PVA, analyzing ease of sample preparation and quality of smears. Sixty-eight fresh stool specimens were divided into aliquots and placed in each of four different fixatives: PARASAFE (PS) (Scientific Devices Laboratory, Inc., Des Plaines, Ill.), ECOFIX (EC) (Meridian Diagnostics, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio), Proto-Fix (PF) (Alpha-Tec Systems, Inc., Vancouver, Wash.), and low-viscosity PVA fixative (PVA) (Meridian). Specimens were processed and stained according to each manufacturer's directions. Parasites were found in 31 of 68 slide preparations with PVA, 31 with PF, 30 with EC, and 30 with PS. Blastocystis hominis and Iodamoeba bütschlii were preserved in a readily identifiable state by all methods of fixation. However, some parasites were more easily identified with some of the fixatives because of differences in parasite distortion. For example, Entamoeba histolytica (Entamoeba dispar) was detected in 13 stools fixed with PF, 7 with PVA, and 6 with EC but none with PS. Likewise, Chilomastix mesnili was identified in 13 specimens fixed with PF, 8 with EC, and 5 with PVA but only 1 with PS, while Entamoeba coli was seen much less frequently with PS than with the other three fixatives. A dirty background was observed in 41% of specimens prepared with PS, whereas background quality was acceptable with other fixatives. Sample preparation was most rapid with PS, although the EC method involved the fewest steps. In conclusion, PVA and PF produced the least parasite distortion, while PS proved unsatisfactory for the identification of E. histolytica, E. coli, and C. mesnili. Both PF and EC appear to be acceptable, environmentally safe substitutes for PVA.

摘要

含有固定剂氯化汞的聚乙烯醇(PVA)被认为是粪便标本永久染色涂片制备中虫卵和寄生虫固定的“金标准”。然而,氯化汞对实验室人员有潜在危害,且存在处置问题。我们将三种新型无毒替代固定剂与PVA进行了比较,分析了样本制备的难易程度和涂片质量。68份新鲜粪便标本被分成若干份,分别置于四种不同的固定剂中:PARASAFE(PS)(科学设备实验室公司,伊利诺伊州德斯普兰斯)、ECOFIX(EC)(子午线诊断公司,俄亥俄州辛辛那提)、Proto - Fix(PF)(阿尔法技术系统公司,华盛顿州温哥华)和低粘度PVA固定剂(PVA)(子午线)。标本按照各制造商的说明进行处理和染色。在68份用PVA制备的载玻片中,有31份发现了寄生虫,用PF的有31份,用EC的有30份,用PS的有30份。所有固定方法都能使人芽囊原虫和布氏嗜碘阿米巴保持易于识别的状态。然而,由于寄生虫变形的差异,一些寄生虫用某些固定剂更容易识别。例如,在用PF固定的13份粪便中检测到溶组织内阿米巴(迪氏内阿米巴),用PVA的有7份,用EC的有6份,用PS的未检测到。同样,在用PF固定的13份标本中鉴定出梅氏唇鞭毛虫,用EC的有8份,用PVA的有5份,用PS的只有1份,而用PS观察到的结肠内阿米巴比其他三种固定剂少得多。在用PS制备的标本中,41%观察到背景脏污,而其他固定剂的背景质量是可以接受的。PS的样本制备最快,不过EC方法涉及的步骤最少。总之,PVA和PF造成的寄生虫变形最小,而PS在鉴定溶组织内阿米巴、结肠内阿米巴和梅氏唇鞭毛虫方面被证明是不令人满意的。PF和EC似乎都是可接受的、对环境安全的PVA替代品。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验