Garcia L S, Shimizu R Y, Shum A, Bruckner D A
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center 90024-1713.
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Feb;31(2):307-10. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.2.307-310.1993.
As a result of disposal problems related to the use of mercury compounds, many laboratories have considered switching from mercuric chloride-based Schaudinn's and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) stool preservatives to other non-mercury-based preservatives. The primary use for PVA-preserved specimens is the permanent stained smear, the most important technique in the routine ova and parasite examination for the identification and confirmation of intestinal protozoa. A comparison of organism recovery and morphology of the intestinal protozoa was undertaken with PVA containing either a zinc sulfate base or the "gold standard" mercuric chloride base. Paired positive fecal specimens (106 from 64 patients) were collected and examined microscopically by the trichrome stain technique. There were 161 instances in which organism trophozoite and/or cyst stages were identified and 3 in which human cells were identified. Morphology, clarity of nuclear and cytoplasmic detail, overall color differences, and the ease or difficulty in detecting intestinal protozoa in fecal debris, as well as the number of patients with a missed diagnosis, were assessed from the permanent stained smear. Overall organism morphology of the intestinal protozoa preserved in zinc sulfate-PVA was not always equal in nuclear and cytoplasmic detail or range of color after permanent staining to that seen with mercuric chloride-PVA. However, the same organisms were usually identified in both specimens, with the exception of situations in which organism numbers were characterized as rare (no organisms per 10 oil immersion fields at x1,000 magnification but at least one organism in the smear) [9 of 161 (5.6%)] or the organism was missed because of poor morphologic detail [12 of 161 (7.5%)]. In only six of these cases [6 of 161 (3.7%)] did the results involve pathogens. The patient diagnosis was missed in four cases of amebiasis and two cases of giardiasis; in both situations the organism numbers were rare. There were no discrepant results with Dientamoeba fragilis. Overall agreement between the two PVA-based results was 87.0% (140 of 161); when the instances of rare organisms were disregarded, the overall agreement was 92.5% (149 of 161). On the basis of these findings, zinc-PVA is viable substitute for mercuric chloride-PVA used for trichrome permanent stained smears.
由于与汞化合物使用相关的处置问题,许多实验室已考虑从基于氯化汞的绍丁氏液和聚乙烯醇(PVA)粪便防腐剂转向其他非汞基防腐剂。PVA保存标本的主要用途是制作永久染色涂片,这是常规虫卵和寄生虫检查中用于鉴定和确认肠道原生动物的最重要技术。对含有硫酸锌基质或“金标准”氯化汞基质的PVA进行了肠道原生动物的生物回收率和形态学比较。收集了成对的阳性粪便标本(来自64名患者的106份标本),并通过三色染色技术进行显微镜检查。有161例鉴定出生物体滋养体和/或包囊阶段,3例鉴定出人体细胞。从永久染色涂片中评估形态学、细胞核和细胞质细节的清晰度、整体颜色差异、在粪便残渣中检测肠道原生动物的难易程度,以及漏诊患者的数量。硫酸锌-PVA保存的肠道原生动物在永久染色后的整体生物体形态在细胞核和细胞质细节或颜色范围上并不总是与氯化汞-PVA保存的一致。然而,除了生物体数量被判定为稀少的情况(在1000倍放大下每10个油镜视野中无生物体,但涂片中至少有一个生物体)[161例中的9例(5.6%)]或由于形态细节不佳而漏检生物体的情况[161例中的12例(7.5%)]外,两个标本中通常能鉴定出相同的生物体。在这些病例中,只有6例[161例中的6例(3.7%)]结果涉及病原体。4例阿米巴病和2例贾第虫病患者的诊断被漏诊;在这两种情况下,生物体数量都很稀少。脆弱双核阿米巴没有出现不一致的结果。两种基于PVA的结果之间的总体一致性为87.0%(161例中的140例);当不考虑生物体稀少的情况时,总体一致性为92.5%(161例中的149例)。基于这些发现,锌-PVA是用于三色永久染色涂片的氯化汞-PVA的可行替代品。