Demanins R, Hess R F, Williams C B, Keeble D R
Ecole d'optométrie, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Vision Res. 1999 Dec;39(24):4018-31. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00107-8.
We show that the previously reported orientation deficit in amblyopia (Skottun, B. C., Bradley, A., & Freeman, R. D. (1986). Orientation discrimination in amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 30, 532-537) also occurs for arrays of randomly positioned Gabor micropatterns for which explanations based on either neural disarray or local neural interactions would not hold. Furthermore, when using Gabors, we show that the deficit varies with the spatial frequency and orientational bandwidth of the stimuli used to measure it. We discuss two competing explanations for this, one based on a broader underlying detector bandwidth in amblyopia (both orientation and spatial frequency) and the other based on a selective deficit of first-order, as opposed to second-order orientation processing in strabismic amblyopia. Our results favour the latter interpretation.
我们发现,先前报道的弱视患者的方向辨别缺陷(Skottun, B. C., Bradley, A., & Freeman, R. D. (1986). 弱视中的方向辨别。《眼科研究与视觉科学》,30, 532 - 537)在随机定位的Gabor微图案阵列中也会出现,而基于神经紊乱或局部神经相互作用的解释并不适用。此外,当使用Gabor图案时,我们发现该缺陷会随着用于测量它的刺激的空间频率和方向带宽而变化。我们讨论了对此的两种相互竞争的解释,一种基于弱视中更广泛的潜在探测器带宽(方向和空间频率),另一种基于斜视性弱视中一阶方向处理与二阶方向处理相比的选择性缺陷。我们的结果支持后一种解释。