• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

厌恶声音记忆效用的决定因素。

Determinants of the remembered utility of aversive sounds.

作者信息

Schreiber C A, Kahneman D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Mar;129(1):27-42. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.129.1.27.

DOI:10.1037//0096-3445.129.1.27
PMID:10756485
Abstract

Retrospective evaluations of aversive episodes were studied in the context of a general model of "judgment by prototype" that has been applied in other situations. Unpleasant sounds of variable loudness and duration were the stimuli. In Experiment 1, continuous reports of annoyance closely tracked variations of noise intensity. Hypotheses about the determinants of retrospective evaluation were examined in Experiment 2. Experiment 3 confirmed a prediction of judgment by prototype: The effects of sound duration and intensity are additive in multitrial experiments. Experiment 4 confirmed a robust preference for aversive episodes that are "improved" by adding a period of reduced aversiveness.

摘要

在已应用于其他情境的“原型判断”通用模型背景下,对厌恶事件进行了回顾性评估。可变响度和时长的不悦声音作为刺激物。在实验1中,烦恼程度的连续报告密切追踪了噪声强度的变化。在实验2中检验了关于回顾性评估决定因素的假设。实验3证实了原型判断的一个预测:在多试验实验中,声音时长和强度的影响是可叠加的。实验4证实了对于通过增加一段厌恶程度降低的时期而“改善”的厌恶事件存在强烈偏好。

相似文献

1
Determinants of the remembered utility of aversive sounds.厌恶声音记忆效用的决定因素。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Mar;129(1):27-42. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.129.1.27.
2
Noise-induced hearing loss induces loudness intolerance in a rat Active Sound Avoidance Paradigm (ASAP).噪声性听力损失在大鼠主动声音回避范式(ASAP)中诱发响度不耐受。
Hear Res. 2017 Sep;353:197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
3
Temporal loudness weights: Primacy effects, loudness dominance and their interaction.时间响度权重:首因效应、响度优势及其相互作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 23;16(12):e0261001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261001. eCollection 2021.
4
Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds - perception by normal hearing subjects.干扰声音的响度与烦恼程度——正常听力受试者的感知
Int J Audiol. 2017 Oct;56(10):775-783. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1321790. Epub 2017 May 9.
5
Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.从烦恼度、响度和可听度评级方面评估标准的空气声隔绝措施。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jul;126(1):208-19. doi: 10.1121/1.3147499.
6
[Annoyance and loudness measurements in auditory fatigue and recovery under different sound exposures].[不同声音暴露条件下听觉疲劳与恢复过程中的烦恼度及响度测量]
Soz Praventivmed. 1980 Jun;25(3):110-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02074973.
7
A comparison of the temporal weighting of annoyance and loudness.烦恼和响度的时间加权比较。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Dec;126(6):3168-78. doi: 10.1121/1.3238233.
8
The temporal weighting of loudness: effects of the level profile.响度的时间加权:声级分布的影响
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Jan;73(1):189-208. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0011-8.
9
Loudness change in response to dynamic acoustic intensity.对动态声强的响度变化响应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1631-44. doi: 10.1037/a0018389.
10
Evaluating roadside noise barriers using an annoyance-reduction criterion.使用降低烦恼度标准评估路边隔音屏障。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Dec;124(6):3561-7. doi: 10.1121/1.2997433.

引用本文的文献

1
Hear it here: Built environments predict ratings and descriptions of ambiguous sounds.在此聆听:建筑环境可预测对模糊声音的评级和描述。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 15;20(1):e0316187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316187. eCollection 2025.
2
Calves peak-end memory of pain.小牛有疼痛的峰值结束记忆。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 7;13(1):5679. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32756-5.
3
Soundwalk path affecting soundscape assessment in urban parks.声景漫步路径对城市公园声景评估的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 9;13:1096952. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1096952. eCollection 2022.
4
Are Student Teachers' Overall Expected Emotions Regarding Their Future Life as a Teacher Biased Toward Their Expected Peak Emotions?实习教师对其未来教师生涯的总体预期情绪是否偏向于他们预期的峰值情绪?
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 6;13:816456. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.816456. eCollection 2022.
5
Measuring and Modeling the Effect of Audio on Human Focus in Everyday Environments Using Brain-Computer Interface Technology.使用脑机接口技术测量和建模音频在日常环境中对人类注意力的影响。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2022 Jan 27;15:760561. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2021.760561. eCollection 2021.
6
Memorable meals: The memory-experience gap in day-to-day experiences.难忘的饭菜:日常体验中的记忆-体验差距。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 30;16(3):e0249190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249190. eCollection 2021.
7
Recall of Affective Responses to Exercise: Examining the Influence of Intensity and Time.对运动情感反应的回忆:探究强度和时间的影响。
Front Sports Act Living. 2020 Nov 12;2:573525. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2020.573525. eCollection 2020.
8
Retrospective Valuation of Experienced Outcome Encoded in Distinct Reward Representations in the Anterior Insula and Amygdala.回顾性评估在前脑岛和杏仁核中不同奖励代表性编码的经验结果。
J Neurosci. 2020 Nov 11;40(46):8938-8950. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2130-19.2020. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
9
Great Expectations: A Qualitative Analysis of the Factors That Influence Affective Forecasts for Exercise.期望很高:影响锻炼情感预测的因素的定性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 15;17(2):551. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020551.
10
From Experience to Memory: On the Robustness of the Peak-and-End-Rule for Complex, Heterogeneous Experiences.从体验到记忆:论复杂多样体验中峰终定律的稳健性
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 24;10:1705. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01705. eCollection 2019.