Suppr超能文献

旁观者实施的胸外按压和辅助通气能分别改善仔猪窒息性无脉“心脏骤停”的预后。

"Bystander" chest compressions and assisted ventilation independently improve outcome from piglet asphyxial pulseless "cardiac arrest".

作者信息

Berg R A, Hilwig R W, Kern K B, Ewy G A

机构信息

University of Arizona Sarver Heart Center, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson 85724, USA.

出版信息

Circulation. 2000 Apr 11;101(14):1743-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.14.1743.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) without assisted ventilation may be as effective as CPR with assisted ventilation for ventricular fibrillatory cardiac arrests. However, chest compressions alone or ventilation alone is not effective for complete asphyxial cardiac arrests (loss of aortic pulsations). The objective of this investigation was to determine whether these techniques can independently improve outcome at an earlier stage of the asphyxial process.

METHODS AND RESULTS

After induction of anesthesia, 40 piglets (11.5+/-0.3 kg) underwent endotracheal tube clamping (6.8+/-0.3 minutes) until simulated pulselessness, defined as aortic systolic pressure <50 mm Hg. For the 8-minute "bystander CPR" period, animals were randomly assigned to chest compressions and assisted ventilation (CC+V), chest compressions only (CC), assisted ventilation only (V), or no bystander CPR (control group). Return of spontaneous circulation occurred during the first 2 minutes of bystander CPR in 10 of 10 CC+V piglets, 6 of 10 V piglets, 4 of 10 CC piglets, and none of the controls (CC+V or V versus controls, P<0.01; CC+V versus CC and V combined, P=0.01). During the first minute of CPR, arterial and mixed venous blood gases were superior in the 3 experimental groups compared with the controls. Twenty-four-hour survival was similarly superior in the 3 experimental groups compared with the controls (8 of 10, 6 of 10, 5 of 10, and 0 of 10, P<0.05 each).

CONCLUSIONS

Bystander CPR with CC+V improves outcome in the early stages of apparent pulseless asphyxial cardiac arrest. In addition, this study establishes that bystander CPR with CC or V can independently improve outcome.

摘要

背景

对于心室颤动性心脏骤停,未进行辅助通气的旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)可能与进行辅助通气的CPR同样有效。然而,单独进行胸外按压或单独进行通气对于完全窒息性心脏骤停(主动脉搏动消失)无效。本研究的目的是确定这些技术是否能在窒息过程的早期独立改善预后。

方法与结果

麻醉诱导后,40只仔猪(11.5±0.3千克)进行气管插管夹闭(6.8±0.3分钟)直至模拟无脉,定义为主动脉收缩压<50毫米汞柱。在8分钟的“旁观者CPR”期间,动物被随机分配至胸外按压并辅助通气(CC+V)、仅胸外按压(CC)、仅辅助通气(V)或无旁观者CPR(对照组)。在旁观者CPR的前2分钟内,10只CC+V组仔猪中有10只恢复自主循环,10只V组仔猪中有6只,10只CC组仔猪中有4只,而对照组均未恢复(CC+V或V组与对照组相比,P<0.01;CC+V组与CC组和V组合并相比,P=0.01)。在CPR的第1分钟,3个实验组的动脉血和混合静脉血气优于对照组。与对照组相比,3个实验组的24小时生存率同样更高(分别为10只中的8只、10只中的6只、10只中的5只和10只中的0只,每组P<0.05)。

结论

CC+V的旁观者CPR可改善明显无脉性窒息性心脏骤停早期的预后。此外,本研究证实CC或V的旁观者CPR可独立改善预后。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验