Jones J W
Warrington Hospital NHS Trust, Cheshire.
Br Dent J. 2000 Mar 11;188(5):237-40. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800441.
This article will cover the history of the tort of negligence and how the judgement in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson enabled the courts to 'develop the law' to allow the concept of a 'duty of care' to develop which was extended to include healthcare professionals. The Bolam test is then described and how it has come to play such a prominent role in assisting the courts to assess if an appropriate standard has been achieved in medical negligence litigation. Attempts by the courts to move away from Bolam are discussed and the difficulties encountered because of the reluctance of the appellate courts to approve such decisions. Finally the recent House of Lords decision in Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority is examined and the implications this may have on the Bolam test.
本文将涵盖过失侵权行为的历史,以及多诺霍诉史蒂文森案的判决如何使法院得以“发展法律”,从而使“注意义务”的概念得以发展,并将其扩展至包括医疗保健专业人员。接着将描述博勒姆测试,以及它如何在协助法院评估医疗过失诉讼中是否达到适当标准方面发挥如此突出的作用。还将讨论法院试图摆脱博勒姆测试的努力,以及由于上诉法院不愿批准此类决定而遇到的困难。最后将审视上议院最近在博利索诉伦敦市和哈克尼卫生局案中的判决及其可能对博勒姆测试产生的影响。