Suppr超能文献

鉴于蒙哥马利诉拉纳克郡卫生局案,重新审视博勒姆案和博利索案。

Re-visiting Bolam and Bolitho in the light of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board.

作者信息

Buttigieg George G

机构信息

University of Malta, Malta.

出版信息

Med Leg J. 2018 Mar;86(1):42-44. doi: 10.1177/0025817217727218. Epub 2017 Aug 21.

Abstract

This article considers the potentially untapped significance of the Bolitho test, while the Bolam test looks to be facing a challenging twilight. It re-examines the landmark House of Lords case of Nadyne Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, having regard for Bolam as modified by Bolitho. Although further jurisprudential Bolam challenge is likely in the wake of the Montgomery ruling, there are grounds for re-examining Bolitho, on its own merits.

摘要

本文探讨了博利索检验潜在的未被发掘的重要意义,而博勒姆检验似乎正面临充满挑战的衰落期。本文重新审视了具有里程碑意义的上议院案例“娜迪恩·蒙哥马利诉拉纳克郡卫生委员会案”,同时考虑到经博利索修正后的博勒姆原则。尽管蒙哥马利案裁决之后可能会有进一步的对博勒姆原则的法理学挑战,但基于其自身的价值,仍有理由重新审视博利索原则。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验