• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏导管插入术后缝线介导的股动脉穿刺部位闭合:缝线辅助活动及出院(STAND I和STAND II)试验结果

Suture-mediated closure of the femoral access site after cardiac catheterization: results of the suture to ambulate aNd discharge (STAND I and STAND II) trials.

作者信息

Baim D S, Knopf W D, Hinohara T, Schwarten D E, Schatz R A, Pinkerton C A, Cutlip D E, Fitzpatrick M, Ho K K, Kuntz R E

机构信息

Beth Israel-Deaconess Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Data Analysis Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2000 Apr 1;85(7):864-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00882-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00882-6
PMID:10758928
Abstract

Despite advances in other aspects of cardiac catheterization, manual or mechanical compression followed by 4 to 8 hours of bed rest remains the mainstay of postprocedural femoral access site management. Suture-mediated closure may prove to be an effective alternative, offering earlier sheath removal and ambulation, and potentially a reduction in hemorrhagic complications. The Suture To Ambulate aNd Discharge trial (STAND I) evaluated the 6Fr Techstar device in 200 patients undergoing diagnostic procedures, with successful hemostasis achieved in 99% of patients (94% with suture closure only) in a median of 13 minutes, and 1% major complications. STAND II randomized 515 patients undergoing diagnostic or interventional procedures to use of the 8Fr or 10Fr Prostar-Plus device versus traditional compression. Successful suture-mediated hemostasis was achieved in 97.6% of patients (91.2% by the device alone) compared with 98.9% of patients with compression (p = NS). Major complication rates were 2.4% and 1.1%, and met the Blackwelder's test for equivalency (p <0.05). Median time to hemostasis (19 vs 243 minutes, p <0.01) and time to ambulation (3.9 vs 14.8 hours, p <0.01) were significantly shorter for suture-mediated closure. Suture-mediated closure of the arterial puncture site thus affords reliable immediate hemostasis and shortens the time to ambulation without significantly increasing the risk of local complications.

摘要

尽管心脏导管插入术的其他方面有所进展,但手动或机械压迫并随后卧床休息4至8小时仍是术后股动脉穿刺部位管理的主要方法。缝合介导的闭合术可能是一种有效的替代方法,它能使鞘管更早拔除并允许患者更早活动,还可能减少出血并发症。“缝合介导以实现活动和出院”试验(STAND I)在200例接受诊断性操作的患者中评估了6Fr的Techstar装置,99%的患者实现了成功止血(仅缝合闭合的患者为94%),中位止血时间为13分钟,主要并发症发生率为1%。STAND II将515例接受诊断性或介入性操作的患者随机分为使用8Fr或10Fr的Prostar-Plus装置组和传统压迫组。与压迫止血组98.9%的患者相比,缝合介导止血组97.6%的患者实现了成功止血(仅使用该装置的患者为91.2%,p = 无显著差异)。主要并发症发生率分别为2.4%和1.1%,满足等效性的布莱克韦尔德检验(p <0.05)。缝合介导闭合的中位止血时间(19分钟对243分钟,p <0.01)和活动时间(3.9小时对14.8小时,p <0.01)明显更短。因此,动脉穿刺部位的缝合介导闭合可实现可靠的即时止血,并缩短活动时间,且不会显著增加局部并发症的风险。

相似文献

1
Suture-mediated closure of the femoral access site after cardiac catheterization: results of the suture to ambulate aNd discharge (STAND I and STAND II) trials.心脏导管插入术后缝线介导的股动脉穿刺部位闭合:缝线辅助活动及出院(STAND I和STAND II)试验结果
Am J Cardiol. 2000 Apr 1;85(7):864-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00882-6.
2
A randomized comparison of a percutaneous suture device versus manual compression for femoral artery hemostasis after PTCA.经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术(PTCA)后,使用经皮缝合装置与手动压迫法进行股动脉止血的随机对照研究。
J Interv Cardiol. 2003 Jun;16(3):217-21. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003.8044.x.
3
Safety and efficacy of clip-based vs. suture mediated vascular closure for femoral access hemostasis: A prospective randomized single center study comparing the StarClose and the ProGlide device.基于夹子与缝线介导的血管闭合用于股动脉穿刺止血的安全性和有效性:一项比较StarClose和ProGlide装置的前瞻性随机单中心研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 15;91(3):402-407. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27116. Epub 2017 May 13.
4
Novel femoral artery puncture closure device in patients undergoing interventional and diagnostic cardiac procedures.用于接受介入性和诊断性心脏手术患者的新型股动脉穿刺闭合装置。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2002 Jan;14(1):9-12.
5
[Percutaneous suture of femoral artery access sites after diagnostic heart catheterization and or coronary intervention. Safety and effectiveness of a new arterial suture technic].[诊断性心脏导管插入术和/或冠状动脉介入术后股动脉穿刺部位的经皮缝合。一种新的动脉缝合技术的安全性和有效性]
Herz. 1998 Feb;23(1):27-34. doi: 10.1007/BF03043009.
6
Early sheath removal after coronary artery interventions with use of a suture-mediated closure device: clinical outcome and results of Doppler US evaluation.使用缝线介导闭合装置进行冠状动脉介入治疗后早期拆除鞘管:临床结局及多普勒超声评估结果
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000 Sep;11(8):1033-7. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61334-7.
7
Management of arterial puncture site after catheterization procedures: evaluating a suture-mediated closure device.导管插入术后动脉穿刺部位的管理:评估一种缝线介导的闭合装置。
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Jun 15;83(12):1658-63. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00174-5.
8
First human experience of thermal arterial closure.热动脉闭合术的首例人体应用经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jul 1;84(1):30-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25152. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
9
Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Manual Compression to Vascular Closure Devices for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Arterial Procedures.比较手动压迫与血管闭合装置用于诊断和治疗性动脉手术的随机对照试验的系统评价
Surg Technol Int. 2015 Nov;27:32-44.
10
Percutaneous suture-mediated closure of femoral access sites deployed through the procedure sheath: initial clinical experience with a novel vascular closure device.经皮缝线介导闭合通过手术鞘置入的股动脉穿刺部位:一种新型血管闭合装置的初步临床经验
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003 Mar;58(3):313-21. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10472.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Sex on Outcomes With Femoral Artery Closure Devices Versus Manual Compression in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中,性别对使用股动脉闭合装置与手动压迫的治疗结果的影响。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 19;7(12):e70256. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70256. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
ESR Essentials: arterial vascular access and closure devices-practice recommendations by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe.红细胞沉降率要点:动脉血管通路与闭合装置——欧洲心血管和介入放射学会的实践建议
Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr;35(4):1858-1867. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11053-3. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
3
Best practices for vascular arterial access and closure: a contemporary guide for the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
血管动脉通路与闭合的最佳实践:心脏导管实验室当代指南
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 14;11:1349480. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1349480. eCollection 2024.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Axiostat Hemostatic Dressing in Aiding Manual Compression Closure of the Femoral Arterial Access Site in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatments: A Preliminary Clinical Experience in Two Centers.阿昔托止血敷料辅助血管内治疗患者股动脉穿刺部位手动压迫闭合的有效性和安全性:两个中心的初步临床经验
J Pers Med. 2023 May 11;13(5):812. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050812.
5
Usefulness of a Nonsuture Closure Device in Patients Undergoing Diagnostic Coronary and Peripheral Angiography.非缝合闭合装置在接受诊断性冠状动脉和外周血管造影患者中的应用价值
Int J Angiol. 2017 Dec;26(4):228-233. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1607037. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
6
Femoral arterial closure using ProGlide® is more efficacious and cost-effective when ambulating early following cardiac catheterization.在心脏导管插入术后早期活动时,使用ProGlide®进行股动脉闭合更有效且更具成本效益。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2016 Oct 11;13:6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.09.002. eCollection 2016 Dec.
7
Anticoagulation During AF Ablation: The Balance between Thromboembolism and Bleeding.房颤消融术中的抗凝:血栓栓塞与出血之间的平衡
J Atr Fibrillation. 2009 Feb 1;1(5):153. doi: 10.4022/jafib.153. eCollection 2009 Feb-Mar.
8
Treatment of Angio-Seal® Vascular Closure Device-Induced Acute Femoral Artery Occlusion with SilverHawk® Directional Atherectomy.使用SilverHawk®定向斑块旋切术治疗Angio-Seal®血管闭合装置引起的急性股动脉闭塞
Cureus. 2016 Dec 2;8(12):e910. doi: 10.7759/cureus.910.
9
Vascular closure devices for femoral arterial puncture site haemostasis.用于股动脉穿刺部位止血的血管闭合装置。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 7;3(3):CD009541. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009541.pub2.
10
Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials on the Safety of Vascular Closure Devices for Femoral Arterial Puncture Site Haemostasis.用于股动脉穿刺部位止血的血管闭合装置安全性的随机试验网络荟萃分析
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 8;5:13761. doi: 10.1038/srep13761.