Suppr超能文献

倾斜盘式与双叶式主动脉瓣置换物:人体术中及术后的血流动力学表现

Tilting disc versus bileaflet aortic valve substitutes: intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic performance in humans.

作者信息

Kleine P, Hasenkam M J, Nygaard H, Perthel M, Wesemeyer D, Laas J

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Herz-Kreislauf-Klinik Bevensen, Bad Bevensen, Germany.

出版信息

J Heart Valve Dis. 2000 Mar;9(2):308-11; discussion 311-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

Due to an asymmetrical/eccentric flow profile at the level of the aortic valve, there is an optimal orientation for each aortic valve design. This study evaluates intraoperative flow dynamics (turbulence and pressure gradient) and follow up results (pressure gradient and left ventricular mass regression) for Medtronic Hall tilting disc (MH) and St. Jude Medical bileaflet (SJM) valves, with both valves in their optimum orientation as defined in previous animal experiments.

METHODS

In a randomized prospective study, MH and SJM valves (size > or = 23 mm) were implanted in their optimum orientation in 24 patients with aortic stenosis. Turbulence measurements were performed intraoperatively via a perivascular ultrasound transducer; Reynold's normal stress (RNS) values were calculated as key markers for turbulent stresses. Transvalvular pressure gradients, interventricular septum and posterior wall thickness were measured by transesophageal echocardiography intraoperatively and six months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Mean valve size was 23.8 mm in both groups. Intraoperative RNS values (MH 7.5 +/- 2.2 N/m2 versus SJM 9.8 +/- 2.3 N/m2) and pressure gradients (MH 10.0 +/- 2.6 mmHg versus SJM 20.0 +/- 3.4 mmHg) were significantly lower for the tilting disc valve. At six months follow up, pressure gradients were reduced by half for both valves (MH 5.3 +/- 1.7 mmHg; SJM 10.4 +/- 2.3 mmHg), with the difference between the valves being maintained. Left ventricular mass regression was accelerated for MH patients with regard to interventricular septum thickness.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the tilting disc mechanism shows superior hemodynamic performance with respect to turbulence and transvalvular pressure gradients compared with the bileaflet mechanism when both valves are implanted in their optimum orientation. This led to significant acceleration of interventricular septum mass regression. The superiority of the tilting disc mechanism is more pronounced in the smaller-sized valves.

摘要

研究背景与目的

由于主动脉瓣水平存在不对称/偏心血流分布,每种主动脉瓣设计都有一个最佳取向。本研究评估了美敦力Hall倾斜盘式(MH)和圣犹达医疗双叶式(SJM)瓣膜在术中的血流动力学(湍流和压力梯度)以及随访结果(压力梯度和左心室质量回归),这两种瓣膜均处于先前动物实验所定义的最佳取向。

方法

在一项随机前瞻性研究中,将MH和SJM瓣膜(尺寸≥23mm)以最佳取向植入24例主动脉瓣狭窄患者体内。术中通过血管周围超声换能器进行湍流测量;计算雷诺正应力(RNS)值作为湍流应力的关键指标。术中及术后6个月通过经食管超声心动图测量跨瓣压力梯度、室间隔和后壁厚度。

结果

两组的平均瓣膜尺寸均为23.8mm。倾斜盘式瓣膜的术中RNS值(MH 7.5±2.2N/m² 对比 SJM 9.8±2.3N/m²)和压力梯度(MH 10.0±2.6mmHg对比SJM 20.0±3.4mmHg)显著更低。随访6个月时,两种瓣膜的压力梯度均降低了一半(MH 5.3±1.7mmHg;SJM 10.4±2.3mmHg),瓣膜之间的差异得以维持。就室间隔厚度而言,MH患者的左心室质量回归加速。

结论

我们的结果表明,当两种瓣膜均以最佳取向植入时,与双叶式瓣膜机制相比,倾斜盘式机制在湍流和跨瓣压力梯度方面表现出更优的血流动力学性能。这导致室间隔质量回归显著加速。倾斜盘式机制的优越性在较小尺寸的瓣膜中更为明显。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验